Search for: "Connecticut Employment Law Letter"
Results 101 - 120
of 449
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2011, 4:51 am
The impact of social networking and technology on labor and employment law is one of many topics that will be addressed at Miller Nash's 2011 Employment Law Half-Day Seminar. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 5:01 am
My good friend, and author of the Connecticut Employment Law Blog, Dan Schwartz, tagged me in his blog hop. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 10:13 am
That is why it is important at the outset that you consult our experienced employment law attorneys for a confidential consultation at 800-893-9645. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 5:44 am
(Here she did not file the state law claims until September 21, 2012, shortly after finally receiving a Right to Sue letter from the EEOC releasing the federal claims). [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 5:27 am
For more information, I recommend Dan Schwartz’s Connecticut Employment Law Blog, where Dan posted a nice summary earlier in the week. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 7:06 am
If you haven’t had your offer letters or employee handbooks revised (or, if you have downloaded one off the internet without making sure it complies with Connecticut law), be sure to do so. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 4:30 pm
Federal and state law compliance-related issues may be confusing and challenging for employers. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 11:09 am
First, the Court noted how case law authorities have routinely held that when an employer disseminates an employee’s administrative charge of discrimination to the employee’s colleagues, a reasonable fact-finder could determine that such conduct constitutes an adverse employment action. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 5:36 am
The concept of names is getting a great deal of press in Connecticut -- no doubt over the story of some Yale Law students who are naming names of individuals who allegedly posted comments about them on an internet board. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 2:32 pm
On Monday March 26, 2012, Senators Richard Blumenthal (Connecticut) and Chuck Schumer (New York), called for federal agencies to determine whether requiring prospective hires to hand over social networking usernames and passwords violates federal law. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 9:33 am
The exception has been applied in contexts other than claims based upon employment. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 7:23 am
This is yet another new area of the law for employers. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 8:48 am
Attorneys can go months -- if not years -- without Supreme Court guidance on employment law issues. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 9:55 am
Let’s assume what the employer has done to you is unlawful — that is, actionable under the law. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 11:46 am
Amherst College is an equal opportunity employer and encourages women, persons of color, and persons with disabilities to apply. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 1:47 am
” As noted in a September 21, 2012 memorandum from the Franczek Radelet law firm about the ruling (here), the need to review social media policies applies to both union and non-union employers, adding that “now more than ever, all employers should continue to review and update all of their policies to ensure that they are specific, narrowly tailored to their business needs, and do not sweep so broadly so as to interfere with employee rights under federal… [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 8:18 pm
For some additional background on states that have implemented laws that may make it more difficult for employers to ban guns on the workplace, such as Georgia, see The Word on Employment Law's take on it. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 8:56 am
NLRB Work Rules and Social Media Policies Continue to Perplex The NLRB may be getting #SocialMedia, but confusion concerning employer work rules and social media policies became obvious yet again in Professional Electrical Contractors of Connecticut (June 4, 2014). [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 11:15 pm
Ok, that was way too much case law. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:42 pm
However, other states, including New Jersey, Connecticut, and Massachusetts, alongside California, have all adopted the ABC test for determining who is an employee under state wage and hour laws. [read post]
