Search for: "Connecticut v. Johnson" Results 41 - 60 of 254
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2020, 4:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Defendants cannot recast the claim as one for breach of contract to avail themselves of the longer six-year limitations period (Johnson v Proskauer Rose LLP, 129 AD3d 59, 68 [1st Dept 2015], citing Kliment, 3 NY3d at 541-42; see Risk Control Assocs. [read post]
7 Dec 2019, 9:00 pm by Karen Tani
Siegel (California State University, Sacramento) on"The Forgotten Origins of Paid Family Leave"; Manisha Sinha (University of Connecticut) on President Donald Trump's "precursor," Andrew Johnson. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 7:22 am by skelly
However, this failure to update direct insurance procurement tax laws may literally prove costly, as illustrated under the recently decided New Jersey Tax Court case, Johnson & Johnson v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Department of Commerce (nikkikalbing@gmail.com) The Future of Law in British Africa on the Eve of IndependenceRabiat Akande, Harvard Law School (oakande@sjd.law.harvard.edu) Marginalizing "Secularism," Decolonizing the State: Missionary Advocacy for Religious Freedom in British Colonial Northern Nigeria, 1945-1960Terence Mashingaidze, Midlands State University, Zimbabwe (mashingaidzet@staff.msu.ac.zw) Constitutionalism and Ritual Controversies in a Zimbabwean Chiefdom,… [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Lund. 50 Connecticut Law Review 849-985 (2018).Allan W. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
It’s also a basic principle of antidiscrimination law.Consider the Supreme Court’s 1982 ruling in Connecticut v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 10:00 am by Site Admin
Where I’m located, there are a lot of people who work for Johnson & Johnson, and Johnson & Johnson is basically known for equaling. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 6:47 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Second Circuit does not see it that way, reviewing some of the ways that plaintiffs can prove their case, including the principle that a plaintiff cannot defeat summary judgment with a sworn statement that contradicts his prior sworn statement.The case is Johnson v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 7:08 am by Andrew Hamm
” At The Narrowest Grounds, Asher Steinberg looks at Kavanaugh’s dissent in Garza v. [read post]