Search for: "Conners v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 41
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2007, 10:12 am
"That basic proportionality argument did not persuade the state Supreme Court, when it was one of a number of arguments made on appeal in State v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 1:13 am
While price-fixing in Canada is not direct evidence of price-fixing in the United States, it certainly makes such a claim plausible, and, in my opinion, should be sufficient to allow the Chocolate cases to survive the motion to dismiss.We'll likely find out what the Court thinks in a few months, when it rules on the motions to dismiss. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 6:13 am by Hannah L. Kaplan
  Pennsylvania is within the appellate jurisdiction of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, which has yet to rule on this issue. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 11:45 am by Steven Cohen
Pettit – United States District Court – Western District of Washington – October 15th, 2018) involves an insurance claim. [read post]
28 May 2018, 1:42 pm by Wolfgang Demino
George, for Plaintiff-Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas.Before: SMITH, BARKSDALE, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.STEPHEN A. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 11:21 am
Judge Conner kindly provided a succinct summary at the start of the opinion: [T]his case concerns the precise parameters of Congress’s enumerated authority under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]