Search for: "Connick v. Myers" Results 21 - 40 of 60
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2011, 6:08 am by Daniel Bell
The Parties’ Arguments In its brief on the merits, the Borough emphasizes the Court’s holding in Connick v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 4:26 am
Pickering’s balancing test applies only when the employee speaks “as a citizen upon matters of public concern” rather than “as an employee upon matters only of personal interest” [Connick v Myers, 461 US 138].5. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 1:50 am
"In Connick v Myers, 461 US 138, the US Supreme Court indicated that federal courts usually will not consider retaliation allegations based on an employee's claim of free speech where "only matters of a personal interest" to the employee, in contrast to "matters of public concern," are involved. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:36 am by James Coppess
” Previously, the court had held in 1983 in Connick v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 6:19 am
Supreme Court indicated in Connick v Myers, 461 US 138, constitutional free speech rights are not implicated when only matters of a personal interest to the individual, in contrast to matters of public concern, are involved.. [read post]