Search for: "Connor v. Johnson" Results 1 - 20 of 198
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2023, 4:34 pm by centerforartlaw
Keppler is a partner at Pierro, Connor & Strauss. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:23 am by INFORRM
On Thursday 8 December 2022, there were hearings in the cases of Soriano v Societe D’Exploitation De L’Hebdomadaire Le Point (SEBDO) & anr (QB-2019-002482) and O’Connor v Ministry of Justice and another (QB-2021-004474). [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:49 am by INFORRM
Canada On 29 November 2022, judgement was handed down in Kaur v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Sanford Levinson This post was prepared for a roundtable onCan this Constitution be Saved? [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am by Bernard Bell
(discussing displacement of Native American tribes); id. at 2483-85 (Roberts, J., dissenting)(same); Johnson v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Thurgood Marshall, named by Johnson in 1967, would turn out to be the last Democratic nominee for a full quarter century, and then Bill Clinton got only two appointments in his eight years of office (as did Barack Obama). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
25 Sep 2021, 1:28 pm
O'Connor was also a well know critic of the Roe v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
But the argument bombed in a moot session and ultimately attracted only the vote of Justice Denise Johnson in Baker v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 11:35 am by Gregory Ablavsky
” This is not simply stirring rhetoric; it represents a repudiation of the elegiac yet resigned attitude toward Native dispossession that has marked the Court’s Indian law decisions as far back as Johnson v. [read post]