Search for: "Connor v. Johnson" Results 1 - 20 of 198
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2023, 7:42 am by Eric Goldman
ACLU, Justice O’Connor claimed that content regulations could be analogized to “cyber-zoning” rules. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm by Jacob Fishman
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:34 pm by centerforartlaw
Keppler is a partner at Pierro, Connor & Strauss. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:23 am by INFORRM
On Thursday 8 December 2022, there were hearings in the cases of Soriano v Societe D’Exploitation De L’Hebdomadaire Le Point (SEBDO) & anr (QB-2019-002482) and O’Connor v Ministry of Justice and another (QB-2021-004474). [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:49 am by INFORRM
Canada On 29 November 2022, judgement was handed down in Kaur v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Sanford Levinson This post was prepared for a roundtable onCan this Constitution be Saved? [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am by Bernard Bell
(discussing displacement of Native American tribes); id. at 2483-85 (Roberts, J., dissenting)(same); Johnson v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Thurgood Marshall, named by Johnson in 1967, would turn out to be the last Democratic nominee for a full quarter century, and then Bill Clinton got only two appointments in his eight years of office (as did Barack Obama). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
25 Sep 2021, 1:28 pm
O'Connor was also a well know critic of the Roe v. [read post]