Search for: "Constantine v. Constantine" Results 1 - 20 of 112
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2010, 2:24 am by sally
Regina v Constantine [2010] EWCA Crim 2406; [2010] WLR (D) 28 “A court had to take account of a confiscation order before making any order ‘involving payment by the defendant’ of costs relating to all of the proceedings that had gone on thus far.” [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 3:33 am by tracey
UPC Telekabel Wien GmbH v Constantin Film Verleih GmbH and Another: (Case C-314/12); [2014] WLR (D) 148 ‘A person who made protected subject matter available to the public on a website without the agreement of the copyright holder, for the purpose of article 3(2) of Parliament and Council Directive 2001/29/EC, was using the services of the Internet service provider of the persons accessing that subject matter, which had to be regarded as an “intermediary” within… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 3:05 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Moore, R. v [2009] EWCA Crim 2080 (07 October 2009) Constantine, R. v [2009] EWCA Crim 2092 (08 October 2009) Source: [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:07 pm
) [1] Maulvi Tamizuddin Khan v Federation of Pakistan and ors 1954 SHC 81. [2] See e.g. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 2:37 am
After all, the leading case on proscribable speech, Brandenburg v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 3:46 am by sally
High Court (Chancery Division) Constantin Medien AG v Ecclestone & Ors [2014] EWHC 387 (Ch) (20 February 2014) Clutterbuck & Anor v Al Amoudi [2014] EWHC 383 (Ch) (20 February 2014) Cometson & Anor v Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council [2014] EWHC 419 (Ch) (21 February 2014) High Court (Family Division) K v B [2014] EWHC B7 (Fam) (31 January 2014) SAB (A Child), Re [2014] EWHC 384 (Fam) (23 January 2014) High Court (Commercial Court)… [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 2:41 am by sally
Supreme Court Cadder v Her Majesty’s Advocate (Scotland) [2010] UKSC 43 (26 October 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Constantine, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2406 (26 October 2010) T, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2439 (26 October 2010) Wakeling, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2210 (15 September 2010) Qayum, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2237 (16 September 2010) Cooper, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2335 (20 September 2010) Nuthoo, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim… [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 12:37 pm by Danny Jacobs
Before today, I had never heard of Romanian sculptor Constantin Brancusi nor his fantastic facial hair. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 12:51 pm
Examining the Problematic Indian Discourse Joseph Mante, Arbitrability and public policy: an African perspective Leonardo V. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
On 2 July 2019, Advocate General (AG) Bobek delivered his opinion in Case C-240/18 P Constantin Film Produktion GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), advising that the EUIPO’s decision to reject the registration of the trade mark ‘Fack Ju Göhte’ because it was too offensive should be annulled. [read post]
4 Aug 2018, 8:58 am
—China Heilongjiang et al v Mongolia Olga Hamama & Olga Sendetska, Interim measures in support of arbitration in Ukraine: lessons from JKX Oil & Gas et al v Ukraine and the recent reform of Ukrainian legislation [read post]
Louisiana First Circuit Court of Appeal again finds that it lacked jurisdiction over an appeal taken from a partial judgment that was not designated as final pursuant to Article 1915(B) of the Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure             In Constantin Land Trust v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 1:32 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
American University Washington College of Law Program on Information Justice & Intellectual Property PresentsSupreme Court Series:Lexmark International, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 2:27 am by Kacper Szkalej
Kacper Szkalej and Sanna WolkInstitute of Intellectual Property, Marketing and Competition Law (IMC), Uppsala UniversityReaders familiar with EU copyright law will recall that national courts of the EU Member States are able to issue injunctions against ISPs (providers of internet access) ordering them to prevent their customers from accessing websites infringing copyright by blocking access to the websites (UPC Telekabel Wien v Constantin Film C-314/12) by reference to Article… [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 12:04 am by John Diekman
Practice point: The defense is available on a defamation claim if the communications were made to persons who had some common interest in the subject matter.Student note: The defense will be defeated by demonstrating that the defendant spoke with malice.Case: Constantine v. [read post]