Search for: "Consumer Attorney Services, P.A. v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 48
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2009, 10:57 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 12:22 pm
That was the Supreme Court's ruling this week in the case of Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz, P.A. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 2:20 pm
United States and United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 3:22 pm
If you require legal advice, you should seek the services of an attorney. [read post]
28 May 2018, 1:18 pm
& Consumer Servs. v. [read post]
28 May 2018, 1:18 pm
& Consumer Servs. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 7:58 am
Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz, P.A. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 8:08 am
Winston, guest bloggerThe Supreme Court of the United States has ruled in United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 8:08 am
Winston, guest bloggerThe Supreme Court of the United States has ruled in United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 10:46 am
Arkovich, P.A. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 3:40 am
Quaker State Oil Refining Corp. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 8:08 pm
Attorney Ryan K. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:20 pm
No. 17-1323 (MN).United States District Court, D. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 8:50 am
The Whistleblower Law Blog is presented as a service of the Private Law Firm, LaBovick & LaBovick, P.A., Civil Justice Prosecutors. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 8:31 am
The Court ruled that the consumer stated a claim under the FCCPA in three respects: 1) the bank’s communications could reasonably be expected to harass the consumer; 2) that they were an attempt to collect a debt that was no longer owed due to the bankruptcy; and 3) the consumers were contacted when they were represented by an attorney. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 10:52 am
I have personal knowledge of the facts stated herein. 2. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 7:05 am
V, § 15, Fla. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm
ASSOULINE & BERLOWE, P.A. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 1:31 pm
(U.S., Feb. 27, 2013); Comcast v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 1:41 pm
1-800-411-Pain Referral Service, LLC v. [read post]