Search for: "Consumer Attorney Services, P.A. v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 48
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2010, 12:22 pm by On behalf of Bankruptcy Legal Group
That was the Supreme Court's ruling this week in the case of Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz, P.A. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 8:08 am by Laura J. Winston
Winston, guest bloggerThe Supreme Court of the United States has ruled in United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 8:08 am by Laura J. Winston
Winston, guest bloggerThe Supreme Court of the United States has ruled in United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 8:50 am
The Whistleblower Law Blog is presented as a service of the Private Law Firm, LaBovick & LaBovick, P.A., Civil Justice Prosecutors. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 8:31 am by Christie D. Arkovich, P.A.
 The Court ruled that the consumer stated a claim under the FCCPA in three respects:  1) the bank’s communications could reasonably be expected to harass the consumer; 2) that they were an attempt to collect a debt that was no longer owed due to the bankruptcy; and 3) the consumers were contacted when they were represented by an attorney. [read post]