Search for: "Consumers Credit Service v. Craig"
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2011, 4:52 am
Authorship credit: M. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:19 am
To give credit where credit is due, Pamela Parker of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd really should have been mentioned as the person who wrote CAOC's brief. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 12:24 pm
(Kim v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 5:27 pm
Pineda v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 7:32 pm
Louis Review September/October 2010 [8] Testimony of Albert C Kelly Jr. to the Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit of the House Committee on Financial Services March 2, 2011 [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:52 am
[v] Consumer discretionary companies, (i.e., retailers, restaurants) are more sensitive to challenging economic conditions and often have a balance sheet full of illiquid assets (i.e., employees, product inventory and commercial real estate). [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:52 am
[v] Consumer discretionary companies, (i.e., retailers, restaurants) are more sensitive to challenging economic conditions and often have a balance sheet full of illiquid assets (i.e., employees, product inventory and commercial real estate). [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
Rev. 1727-1817 (2010).Smith, Craig. [read post]
21 May 2020, 8:47 am
Surescripts and U.S. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act protects consumers from various unsavory practices that are sometimes employed by debt collectors. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act protects consumers from various unsavory practices that are sometimes employed by debt collectors. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:58 am
Brown, Jim Rossi and Robin Kundis Craig. 81 U. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:14 am
Tipples J held that the ordinary meaning of the words meant that DAM charged a driver an excessive sum for a replacement vehicle; the company has taken advantage of the lack of regulation in the credit hire sector to seek to charge excessive costs and DAM is a particularly bad example of a credit hire organisation charging excessive credit hire costs [48]. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 1:31 pm
(U.S., Feb. 27, 2013); Comcast v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:45 am
(U.S., Feb. 27, 2013); Comcast v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:00 am
Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 2:00 am
It’s undoubtedly a great looking and clever bit of kit, but Jon’s conclusion that it is better for consuming media than creating it means I probably won’t be flexing the plastic just yet. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 10:38 am
–Citigroup: The financial services company officially reports $45.2 billion offshore for tax purposes on which it would owe $12.7 billion in U.S. taxes. [read post]