Search for: "Content Admin"
Results 41 - 60
of 704
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2023, 7:01 pm
Senger, and stay-at-home father Daniel Kotzin in a lawsuit that alleges the Biden admin violated the First Amendment by pressuring Twitter to censor so-called Covid-19 “misinformation. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 2:15 pm
Other content management systems, like Webflow, have built-in sitemap generators. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
*This post is part of a symposium on Modernizing Regulatory Review. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 4:33 am
This week we bring in Christian Lang, the CEO and founder of LEGA, a company that provides a secure platform for law firms and legal departments to safely implement and govern the use of large language models (LLMs) like Open AI’s GPT-4, Google’s Bard, and Anthropic’s Claude. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 12:08 pm
As the Texas Department of Health has reported, there is a Shigella Outbreak in Lavaca County that has sickened nearly 100. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 10:01 am
We are the student body and faculty that fought back when investor-focused admin attempted to [interfere with the boycott of Palestinians], saying loud and clear that [Israel] can no longer be the exception to our pursuit of justice, that our morality will not be purchased by investors…. [read post]
31 May 2023, 4:05 am
The content of religious education teaching must include, at least to some degree, the teaching of non-religious beliefs (such as humanism).... [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:29 am
The decision in R (on the application of Fox) v Secretary of State for Education [2015] EWHC 3404 (Admin) concerned the new subject content issued for GCSE Religious Studies. [read post]
26 May 2023, 9:26 am
It is difficult to understand how a system of mandatory payments imposed on only a subset of content providers could be enforced without undermining net neutrality. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:00 am
” Human Resources Admin., v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:00 am
” Human Resources Admin., v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 9:30 pm
This post, by Karen Tani (University of Pennsylvania), is the fifth in a series of posts in which legal historians reflect on Outside In: The Oral History of Guido Calabresi (Oxford University Press), by Norman I. [read post]
9 May 2023, 4:51 pm
The reasoning is obviously flawed and is potentially even a copy/paste error from Google’s content review team. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:28 pm
The High Court accepted that the breach was not ongoing, but I reject the defendant’s contention that I should not consider whether there has been a breach of s.193(2). [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:00 am
I will leave it to other commentators to parse the decision and its significance, while I highlight a tiny but useful part of its reasoning for those of us in the admin law trenches: It takes judicial notice of the contents of old web pages preserved on the Wayback Machine. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 12:37 am
Revd Paul Williamson in court again In July 1997, the Revd Paul Williamson was made the subject of a Civil Proceedings Order as a vexatious litigant pursuant to s.42(1A) Senior Courts Act 1981 (Restriction of vexatious legal proceedings), primarily as a result of a series of proceedings arising from his opposition to the ordination of women: see R v HM Attorney-General ex parte Reverend Paul Stewart Williamson [1997] EWHC Admin 691. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
For example, if you’re asking someone to login to your website to post content or make changes, they will need to have: The URL of the website admin login The username to use to log in A valid password for that username Or they may need access to documents, which hopefully are in digital form because that makes it easy to share a link to the documents. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
No admin oversight of content. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am
On 29 March 2023, judgment was handed down by Saini J in the3million & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWHC 713 (Admin). [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Policy v New York City Off. of Payroll Admin., 187 AD3d 435, 435 [1st Dept 2020] [internal quotation marks omitted], lv denied 36 NY3d 906 [2021]; see also Matter of Bellamy v New York City Police Dept., 87 AD3d 874, 875 [1st Dept 2011], affd 20 NY3d 1028 [2013]). [read post]
