Search for: "Continental Can Co., Inc. v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 160
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Questionnaires should require information on whether the nominee is an employee, officer, partner or co-investor of the nominating stockholder. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 5:18 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Birrs LJ also ventured further than this and asserted that the court can determine the validity of a foreign patent if it is relevant to the enforcement of the contract in Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co Ltd v GW Pharma Ltd [2022] EWCA Civ 1462. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
You can find other posts at the symposium page here. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 8:16 am by Cinthia Macie
  More than 80% of the beef in the U.S. is likewise currently processed by just four companies:  Cargill, Tyson Foods, JBS USA, and National Beef Packing Co. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 5:39 pm by Russell Knight
This, we conclude, constitutes substantial compliance with Supreme Court Rule 201(k)” John Mathes & Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The diverging approaches of the majority and the dissenters in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 6:21 pm by Chukwuma Okoli
From Okoli and Oppong (2020), and my assessment of reported cases, jurisdiction agreements have only been upheld in five cases: Nso v Seacor Marine (Bahamas) Inc (2008) LPELR-CA, Beaumont Resources Ltd v DWC Drilling Ltd (2017) LPELR-42814 (CA), Nika Fishing Co Ltd v Lavina Corporation (2008) 16 NWLR (Pt 1114) 509, Megatech Engineering Ltd Sky Vission Global  Networks LLC (2014) LPELR-22539 (CA) and Damac Star Properties LLC v Profitel… [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 8:43 pm by Guangjian Tu
This case was thought to be of great significance by many commentators because it could open the door for enforcement of arbitral awards issued by foreign institution with seat of proceeding in China, and demonstrates the opening-up trend for foreign legal service. [1]Brentwood Industries Inc. v. [read post]