Search for: "Contract Steel Carriers v. United States"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2020, 2:35 pm
Steel Corp. v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 1:19 pm
(citing United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 10:00 pm
The airline allegedly breached its contract with customers when it cancelled flights during the COVID-19 pandemic and offered vouchers instead of cash refunds.As noted in the underlying complaint, on April 3, 2020, United States Department of Transportation (DOT) released an enforcement notice which advised carriers, such as BA, that they had a “longstanding obligation … to provide a prompt refund to a ticketed passenger when the carrier… [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 12:11 pm
Because Morris involved transportation of goods not passengers, the Third Circuit looked at cases arising in other contexts that defined interstate transportation of passengers, including United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 10:56 am
To be sure, he also cites one Pennsylvania case--Barium Steel Corp. v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:56 am
" Oil States Energy Servs. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had little justification in the internationallaw the United States claimed to be upholding, and the United States prosecuted the wars whileindifferent to the civilian casualties they imposed. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 3:46 pm
MARCH SITTING: New Process Steel v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:17 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 6:05 am
Contract Carrier Company that transports freight under contract with one or a limited number of shippers. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 9:45 am
United National Ins. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 9:12 pm
The Board separately remanded to the judge the claims of six other individuals for a determination of whether they were authorized to be present and employed in the United States during the backpay period and thus entitled to backpay. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 3:14 am
The securities complaint filed on April 8 alleged that the defendants failed to disclose: (i) that the Company had engaged in anticompetitive conduct by employing a discriminatory pricing policy for raw material sales between domestic and foreign steel firms; (ii) that the Company had engaged in monopolistic conduct by fixing and maintaining coking coal prices at artificially high levels and unreasonably refusing contracts; (iii) that as the… [read post]
23 May 2011, 7:57 am
Nevertheless, Tenaris earned a profit of $4.79 million from these four contracts. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 10:10 am
§§ 1981 & 1982, the federal statutes that have been read as banning discrimination in contracting and property transactions based on race or ethnicity (including discrimination based on the target's being Jewish). [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 7:08 am
Gloria Steele will deliver the welcoming remarks. [read post]
