Search for: "Contreras v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 94
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2011, 1:01 pm by Zoe Tillman
Contreras “made strong and aggressive arguments for the United States, but he also was open to listening to counter arguments and to our side,” Robinson said. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 7:35 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Despite declaring a metaphorical war on metaphors earlier this term, see United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:08 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Soto v Contreras, 2018 WL 507802 (5th Cir., 2018) Veronica Lemus Contreras (Lemus), a native and citizen of Mexico residing in the United States, appealed from a judgment which granted the petition of Ontiveros Soto’s (Ontiveros) seeking return of their child, A.O.L., to Mexico. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 4:19 pm by Steven D. Schwinn
Schwinn, John Marshall Law School Judge Rudolph Contreras (D.D.C.) ruled in Byers v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 8:12 am by Ruthann Robson
Trump, United States District Judge for the District of Columbia, Rudolph Contreras, issued a preliminary injunction requiring the defendants President Trump... [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 8:44 am by Ben Vernia
District Judge Rudolph Contreras issued a decision following a four-week bench trial in United States ex rel. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 11:55 am by Jason Rantanen
  Moreover, Judge Higginson points out that both HTC and Ericsson, as well as the United States as amicus curiae, requested jury instructions on apportionment. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 12:18 pm
United States, 523 U.S. 224, 226-27 (1998) is still good law. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 11:59 am by Jason Rantanen
  The Genius of Shepard’s I am pretty sure that every law student in the United States still learns to use the venerable Shepard’s citation system. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 12:40 pm by Kym Stapleton
Defendants' sentences do not violate the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution.[.] [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:09 pm by Dwight Sullivan
The issues for Wednesday’s argument in United States v. [read post]