Search for: "Converse, Inc. v. International Trade Commission" Results 1 - 20 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2014, 6:00 am by Tim Sitzmann
Reports peg the number as at least 22 separate lawsuits against more than 30 companies, both in district court and at the International Trade Commission (the “ITC”). [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 1:20 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Oct. 30, 2018, Converse, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 12:42 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  This was an appeal from the International Trade Commission’s (“the Commission”) affirmance of ALJ Theodore R. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
International Securities Exchange, LLC       Rule 146(b)(1)(iv) (options) The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC Release 87-C (Global Select, Global & Capital Markets) Rule 260.101.2 (Global Market) Rule 260.105.17(b) (Global Market) Sec. 18(b)(1)(A)*** Rule 146(b)(1)(v)  National Stock Exchange, Inc.         [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:56 am
The drafters of the motion have now prepared a detailed reply to Wouter's comments, which is handily summarised in this post.* When three is company: trilogue happy with proposed EU trade mark reformsWondering what might be the fate of the European Commission's proposals for trade mark reform? [read post]
23 May 2017, 1:06 am by Jani Ihalainen
Ultimately, following the Jazz Photo Corp. v International Trade Commission case, the Court determined that no legal rule to this effect existed. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:36 am by Robert B. Milligan and Daniel P. Hart
  After a study prepared for the European Commission identified substantial perceived weaknesses in the trade secrets protections afforded by the laws of many Member States, the European Commission announced a proposal for a Directive on trade secrets that, if enacted, will substantially alter the legal landscape in Europe regarding trade secret protection and will enhance cross-border certainty within the EU. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:50 pm by Robert Milligan
Expanded Role Of The International Trade Commission in Preventing Foreign Trade Secret Theft             The Federal Circuit’s decision in TianRui Group Co. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
Indeed, respondents essentially concede that if an entity is a "public body" for purposes of the OML, it is a public "agency" for purposes of FOIL (see generally Perez, 5 NY3d at 528), although the converse is not necessarily true (see Citizens for Alternatives to Animal Labs, Inc. v Board of Trustees of State Univ. of New York, 92 NY2d 357, 362 [1998]). [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 11:28 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
We had a guest post in this blog providing a descriptive comment on the decision of the two judge Bench in Union of India v Hardy Exploration & Production (India) Inc (2018: SCI)("Hardy I") referring the matter to a larger Bench of the Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 3:57 pm
Knowing this possibility may hinder the Attorney-Client relationships because the company may be afraid to disclose certain conversations regarding, for instance, the companyâ€s questionable antitrust and securities activities to the Department of Justice (DOJ) for fear that the DOJ will pass along the information to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 6:09 am
Thompson (Georgetown University), on Wednesday, February 28, 2018 Tags: Class actions, Insider trading, Rule 10b-5, Securities enforcement, Securities litigation, Securities regulation, Supreme Court, U.S. federal courts The Governance of Foundation-Owned Firms Posted by Henry Hansmann (Yale Law School) and Steen Thomsen (Copenhagen Business School), on Thursday, March 1, 2018 Tags: Agency costs, Boards of… [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
Supreme Court dismisses appeal in Servier v Apotex. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm by ligitsec
In addition to the right to publish the Ford memoirs in book form, the agreement gave petitioners the exclusive right to license prepublication excerpts, known in the trade as “first serial rights. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 10:20 am by Eric Goldman
Earlier this month, the Commission affirmed the ALJ ruling in a 3-1 ruling (one commissioner was recused). [read post]