Search for: "Converse, Inc. v. International Trade Commission"
Results 21 - 40
of 94
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2016, 4:20 am
International Trade Commission, 616 F.3d 1318, 1328 (Fed. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:50 pm
International Trade Commission confirmed that the ITC has jurisdiction to address trade secret claims, even when the alleged wrongful conduct occurs in a foreign country. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46) Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 6:09 am
Thompson (Georgetown University), on Wednesday, February 28, 2018 Tags: Class actions, Insider trading, Rule 10b-5, Securities enforcement, Securities litigation, Securities regulation, Supreme Court, U.S. federal courts The Governance of Foundation-Owned Firms Posted by Henry Hansmann (Yale Law School) and Steen Thomsen (Copenhagen Business School), on Thursday, March 1, 2018 Tags: Agency costs, Boards of… [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
As is customary, my remarks this afternoon are in my official capacity as SEC Enforcement Director, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Commission, the Commissioners, or other members of the staff. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm
In addition to the right to publish the Ford memoirs in book form, the agreement gave petitioners the exclusive right to license prepublication excerpts, known in the trade as “first serial rights. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
Supreme Court dismisses appeal in Servier v Apotex. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 10:39 pm
Highlights this week included: Lego brick cannot be registered as a trade mark, rules ECJ: Lego Juris v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:48 pm
In Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), Domain name transfer made easier: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), Quantum of obviousness in Australian patent laws - C Lawson: (IP Down Under), Separating Sony sheep from Grokster (and Kazaa) goats: Reckoning [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 10:20 am
Earlier this month, the Commission affirmed the ALJ ruling in a 3-1 ruling (one commissioner was recused). [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am
This essay explores the possible dual readings of AT&T v. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
On Sept. 29, 2006, the Board issued its decisions in Oakwood Healthcare, Croft Metals, and Golden Crest, in light of the Supreme Court's decision in NLRB v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 1:08 pm
The District Court, noting the absence of any on-point Fourth Circuit precedent, relied on the 2000 decision in Network Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 8:30 am
Patent Nos. 5,827,698 (the “ ‘698 patent”) and 6,040,160 (the “ ‘160 patent”).[8] In April of 2006, Ajinomoto filed a complaint with the International Trade Commission (“ITC”) alleging that the importation of various lysine feed products was a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, 19 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 1:38 pm
Trust, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am
’s V 2.65% $5.3 billion deal to acquire Plaid Inc., a key player in the financial-technology space. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 6:36 am
Streamlining Management and Internal Processes Mr. [read post]
