Search for: "Cook v. Superior Court" Results 1 - 20 of 261
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2024, 5:23 am by Mark Ashton
This afternoon’s Superior Court ruling in Pennington v. [read post]
App. 5th 721 (2022), the Los Angeles Superior Court sustained defendants’ omnibus demurrer without leave to amend, finding that because cooking in air fryers only generates acrylamide in certain kinds of food and not all, defendants were not obligated to provide a Prop 65 warning. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 1:19 pm
An unfortunate coincidence revealed the limits to the algorithm in May 2022 when, a week after news leaked that the Supreme Court was poised to strike down Roe v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:48 am by susan
Finally, by drawing on the R v Bissonnette decision, the Court elaborated that the principle of proportionali [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Nonetheless, the Supreme Court has issued decisions making any such reforms difficult to adopt and enforce. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 5:01 am by Jeff Welty
A similar pattern nearly played out in Franklin County, where former clerk of court Patricia Chastain, who had been removed from office by a superior court judge, narrowly lost her bid to be elected back to the same position. [read post]
23 May 2022, 4:00 am by David Bilinsky
On May 12, 2022 the British Columbia Court of Appeal issued reasons in the case of: Trial Lawyers Association of British Columbia v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 9:00 am
(MID-L-6306-21, Superior Court of New Jersey, Middlesex County), a New Jersey Superior Court judge granted plaintiffs’ motion for certification in a case stemming from PFAS contamination of the county’s water supply. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
On 14 March 2022, the Supreme Court denied Julian Assange permission to appeal against the High Court’s decision to extradite him to the United State as the application did not raise an arguable point of law. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 5:40 am
Johnson Opinion appears to be dicta and should only be considered to be more in the form of an advisory opinion by the Superior Court on the scope and reach of the Fair Share Act given that one judge on the Superior Court panel sat out of the decision. [read post]