Search for: "Cook v. Superior Court" Results 1 - 20 of 232
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2024, 1:18 am by INFORRM
Last week in the courts On Monday 21 October 2024, there was an application by the claimant in the case of Ibrahim v Kennedy KB-2023-002865. [read post]
21 May 2024, 6:00 am by Anna Price
The Superior Court affirmed the plan commission’s decision rejecting Quintana’s amendment. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 5:23 am by Mark Ashton
This afternoon’s Superior Court ruling in Pennington v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 10:48 am by Ken White
State of California et al., CIVDS1801387 (San Bernardino County Superior Court) is both the most notorious and most disappointing recent litigation concerning Bigfoot. [read post]
App. 5th 721 (2022), the Los Angeles Superior Court sustained defendants’ omnibus demurrer without leave to amend, finding that because cooking in air fryers only generates acrylamide in certain kinds of food and not all, defendants were not obligated to provide a Prop 65 warning. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 1:19 pm
An unfortunate coincidence revealed the limits to the algorithm in May 2022 when, a week after news leaked that the Supreme Court was poised to strike down Roe v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Nonetheless, the Supreme Court has issued decisions making any such reforms difficult to adopt and enforce. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 5:01 am by Jeff Welty
A similar pattern nearly played out in Franklin County, where former clerk of court Patricia Chastain, who had been removed from office by a superior court judge, narrowly lost her bid to be elected back to the same position. [read post]
23 May 2022, 4:00 am by David Bilinsky
On May 12, 2022 the British Columbia Court of Appeal issued reasons in the case of: Trial Lawyers Association of British Columbia v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 9:00 am
(MID-L-6306-21, Superior Court of New Jersey, Middlesex County), a New Jersey Superior Court judge granted plaintiffs’ motion for certification in a case stemming from PFAS contamination of the county’s water supply. [read post]