Search for: "Cooper v. California"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,588
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2011, 4:10 am
In Perry v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 11:40 am
Schickman is of counsel with Freeland Cooper & Foreman LLP in San Francisco and Editor of California Employment Law Letter. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 4:01 pm
After indictment, Sawyer pled guilty and cooperated. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 5:42 pm
The Requirements for a DUI Sobriety Checkpoint to be Legal Under the California Constitution In the 1987 case of Ingersoll v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 7:54 am
In North Dakota v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 11:21 am
AB 793 (Statute of Limitations/Claims Relating to Discriminatory Compensation): This bill would follow the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Ledbetter v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 3:39 pm
By David Swedelson, Community Association Attorney and Partner at SwedelsonGottlieb The Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act is the common name of the portion of the California Civil Code beginning with section 1350, which governs condominium, cooperative, and planned unit development communities in California. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 9:26 pm
CollegeSource’s CEO, Cooper, declared, ‘Our California phone number and address is prominently displayed on our website’s ‘Contacts’ page. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 2:47 am
U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 3:25 pm
In Lasalle v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 11:12 am
The political and legal debate over California's policy towards same-sex marriage reached the Supreme Court on March 26 when the justices heard arguments in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 3:26 pm
Balderas v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:00 pm
(Knight v. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 9:25 am
The Los Angeles jury issued the verdict in Rudnicki v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
[t]he act contemplates a cooperative state-federal enforcement regime. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:26 am
The efficacy of the agency to city/county cooperation agreements described above is also far from certain. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:02 pm
Second, the judge told the parties up front to put aside their prepared remarks and go straight to Q & A.According to the AP story, the judge was most skeptical of the California law regulating employer cooperation with the federal immigration authorities. [read post]
11 May 2009, 1:54 pm
"The State of California may be about to execute an innocent man. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 5:44 am
The first case, City of Riverside v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 5:02 pm
” (Citing Muzzy Ranch Co. v. [read post]
