Search for: "Cooper v. Cooper"
Results 61 - 80
of 10,451
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2024, 2:35 pm
Decoding China's Reading of Global Development and Cooperation NormsMarina Rudyak IV. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 6:53 am
” “Disqualification can likewise lead to a claim for legal malpractice or breach of fiduciary duty, as illustrated in the April 2022 decision of RevoLaze LLC v. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 5:52 am
“Vacating the dismissal order is consistent with the public policy of this State to dispose of cases on their merits (Harwood v Chaliha, 291 AD2d 234, 234 [1st Dept 2002]), and upholds the principle that a trial court’s power to dismiss an action sua sponte should be used ‘sparingly and only in extraordinary circumstances'” (Cooper v Broems, 214 AD3d 497, 497 [1st Dept 2023] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Ray v Chen, 148… [read post]
20 Oct 2024, 10:30 pm
In the case of Ungarean v. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 11:22 am
Cooper, 767 F.3d 721, 728 (7th Cir. 2014). [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 4:52 am
Urvan v. [read post]
16 Oct 2024, 11:05 am
Enforced Disappearances), with introductory note by Ariel Dulitzky Convention on Int'l Cooperation in the Investigation and Prosecution of the Crime of Genocide, Crimes against Humanity and War Crimes, with introductory note by Hilly Moodrick-Even Khen Case C-632/20 P, Spain v. [read post]
15 Oct 2024, 7:11 am
See Mattick v. [read post]
15 Oct 2024, 6:24 am
On August 6, the United States submitted “written observations” to the International Criminal Court (ICC) concerning the Prosecutor’s investigation of the “Situation in the State of Palestine. [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 2:50 am
IPSO 01118-24 Barrowman v Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy, No breach – after investigation 03617-24 Senvardar v The Mail on Sunday, 1 Accuracy, 2 Privacy, No breach – after investigation Statements in open court and apologies As aforementioned, on Friday 11 October 2024 there was a Statement in Open Court in the case of Vine v Barton KB-2024-000733. [read post]
13 Oct 2024, 9:01 pm
As the Supreme Court made clear in the 1946 seminal ruling in Bell v. [read post]
13 Oct 2024, 9:01 pm
” While the SEC has often asserted its willingness to give cooperation credit in the resolution of its enforcement actions, [11] it has historically been less forthcoming in providing meaningful guidance on how such cooperation should be translated to real world situations. [read post]
10 Oct 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s recent holding in Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) v. [read post]
10 Oct 2024, 7:00 am
Controlled substances are classified according to Schedules ranging from Schedule I, the most severe, to V, the least severe. [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 5:31 am
Pete will be arguing on behalf of the challengers in Garland v. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 4:32 am
In McCulloch v. [read post]
6 Oct 2024, 5:58 pm
In United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 8:37 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 5:28 am
Moreover, the complaint fails to allege fraud with any particularity (see CPLR 3016[b]; see Browne v Lyft, Inc., 219 AD3d 445, 447 [2d Dept 2023]; Shah v Mitra, 171 ADed 971, 976 [2d Dept 2019]). [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 8:33 pm
One of the most significant cases guiding custody decisions is Holly v. [read post]
