Search for: "Cooper v. International Business Machines Corporation" Results 1 - 20 of 47
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2021, 10:00 am
  They might be brought out on state occasions, and perhaps even when international dignitaries--like the members of the UN Working Group for Business and Human Rights--appear, but otherwise are understood either as a passive resource (to be activated by other bureaucrats with mandates of far more importance to the political leadership) or as necessary window dressing to satisfy the needs of inbound corporate investors, the international financial community,… [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:44 am by John Buhl
GILTI is equal to what is called “net tested income” minus 10 percent of “Qualified Business Asset Investment” (QBAI). [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 8:53 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Sierra Club v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 9:43 am
Co., 63 AD3d 1522, 1523-1524 [4th Dept 2009] [manufacturer and distributor of machine were not necessary parties in insured’s declaratory judgment action against insurer for defense and indemnification in underlying personal injury action]; Silverman v State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 3:57 pm
Even if a future proposed rule adopts the In re M & L Business Machine Co.[29] version of selective waiver and becomes one where the prerequisite for the shield of selective waiver is that a confidentiality agreement should first be obtained from the government, this would be a bad idea. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:05 am by JB
The key technological innovation in his day was the copying machine. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
&ndash; Tackling music piracy in Africa (Afro-IP) &nbsp; Australia Patent infringement and account of profits: Black &amp; Decker Inc v GMCA Pty Ltd (No 5) (IP Down Under) MONSTER ENERGY keeps battling: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) High Court provides guidance on contributory infringement provision: Northern Territory v Collins (International Law Office) &nbsp;PricewaterhouseCooper… [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
 (1709 Copyright Blog) (IPKat)   Germany German Federal Patent Court finds ‘Weihnachts-Zauber’ (Christmas magic) lacks distinctiveness for chocolate confectionary (Class 46) WANGZHIHE: To win trademark squatting case through anti-fair competition law (IP China)   India India frees up foreign payment of royalties (IP finance)   Netherlands District Court of The Hague: Patent Attorney failed to exercise due care; barred from making further changes to names in which… [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am by Kelly
(Chicago IP Litigation Blog) International Game Technology – Department of Justice busts planned counterfeit slot machines operation (ArsTechnica) US Trademarks Enhancing electronic communications for trademarks (Director’s Forum) US Trade Marks – Decisions 9th Circuit: Naked license in trademark leads to abandonment: FreeCycle Sunnyvale v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm by Marie Louise
Kedge Holding (EPLAW) Infringement of medical device: AGA Medical Corporation v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 6:20 pm
Within that administrative institution, the UNWGBHR has been tasked by the UN Human Rights Council, since the time of the endorsement of the UNGPA, to promote effective and comprehensive dissemination, promote good practices, provide support, gather data on the situation on the ground explore options respecting the UNGP and the business and human rights project, working in close cooperation with other human rights organs  assisted by the OHCHR.[10]   Nonetheless,… [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Spicy IP) Opposing identical trade mark registrations (International Law Office) &nbsp; Ireland Economic stimulus for intellectual property in Ireland (Patent Baristas) &nbsp; Israel Adjudicator at Israel Patent Office rules on late filing of evidence (The IP Factor) &nbsp; Japan Super accelerated examination (IP Frontline) &nbsp; Kenya Kenya exercises power to deal with substandard batteries (Afro-IP) &nbsp; Korea Determining reasonable remuneration for in-service… [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
” (e-commerce@its.best.uk, Cabinet Office 1999.)So long as those harnessed to the task of implementing policy don’t kick over the traces, the uncertain business of persuading a democratically elected legislature to enact a law is avoided.The Communication displays no enthusiasm for Article 15. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
” (e-commerce@its.best.uk, Cabinet Office 1999.)So long as those harnessed to the task of implementing policy don’t kick over the traces, the uncertain business of persuading a democratically elected legislature to enact a law is avoided.The Communication displays no enthusiasm for Article 15. [read post]