Search for: "Cooper v. Johnson*" Results 1 - 20 of 500
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2020, 7:25 am by Almudena Azcárate Ortega
This is another measure that aims to promote international cooperation. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am by Matthias Weller
(Prospective) Terms of Judicial Cooperation Even if the path of EU-UK Judicial Cooperation has eventually led to The Hague, there is still a considerable leeway in the implementation of international common rules. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:20 am by Melissa Kucinski
  Central Authorities have a responsibility under the Convention to “cooperate with each other and to promote cooperation among internal authorities to secure the prompt return of the child …”. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 9:54 pm by Sme
App., March 29, 2018) (declining to disturb determination that holiday actress was Deseret employee: the Board's conclusion that she was under the control and direction of Deseret Book was supported by substantial evidence)Fur Breeders Agricultural Cooperative v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 12:14 pm by William McGrath
The Court also rejected arguments regarding the production of documents, the ability of defendants to secure foreign documents by Letters Rogatory, or the production of documents under Brady v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 8:15 am
Whether documents were testimonial depended on whether the declarant realized she was talking to a government agent, in United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 2:34 am
Sixth Circuit SEAL.gif Another circuit finds a statement against interest under FRE 804(b)(3) is non-testimonial; Cooperating witness's tape recording of co-defendant bragging to other inmates about his and the defendant's role in the charged robbery was non-testimonial because "a reasonable person in the declarant's [co-defendant's] position" would not anticipate his statement being used against the defendant in investigating and prosecuting… [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 7:25 am by Jeralyn
Meanwhile, the FTC has filed a lawsuit in the District of Nevada, FTC v. [read post]