Search for: "Cooper v. Oklahoma" Results 41 - 60 of 176
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2013, 8:05 pm by John Elwood
Cooper, 12-7516 (the Fifth Circuit state-on-bottom habeas case, now up for its fifth relist); and Harris v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 2:38 pm by Aurora Barnes
Murphy 17-1107 Issue: Whether the 1866 territorial boundaries of the Creek Nation within the former Indian Territory of eastern Oklahoma constitute an “Indian reservation” today under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 12:19 pm by Andrew Hamm
Warden 19-941Issue: Whether the Supreme Court’s unanimous holding in Cooper v. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 4:08 am
Randall, 357 U.S. 513 (1958)(striking down requirement of loyalty oath in order to obtain tax benefits)Cooper v. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 9:04 am
Sánchez de Lozada and Mamani, et al. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
  The federal government allegedly is putting someone to a choice between compliance with a civil obligation and adherence to a restrictive religious injunction (roughly speaking:  “Thou Shalt Not Cooperate With Evil”). [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:06 pm by Dan Flynn
AUSTIN — It was a long but primarily quiet Monday as a 12-man, four-woman jury was selected to hear the United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 3:55 pm by Howard Friedman
It also rejected damage claims on sovereign immunity grounds.In Cooper v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
AUSTIN — The timeline played the starring role during the opening arguments at the jury trial of the United States v Paul Kruse. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 2:11 pm by John W. Arden
Details of the complaint and proposed consent decree in U.S., State of Missouri, and State of Nebraska v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 3:41 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
In 2022, Congress and the Supreme Court altered the already byzantine scheme of criminal jurisdiction on tribal land through the Reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act and Oklahoma v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 7:01 am by William Baude
The Supreme Court has heard a lot of preemption suits, but Tuesday’s arguments in Armstrong v. [read post]