Search for: "Cooper v. Oklahoma" Results 41 - 60 of 140
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm by John Elwood
Hewlett-Packard Co., 15-1130, and Cooper v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 5:41 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Coercion, Cooperative Federalism and Conditional Spending after NFIB v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
(Indeed, the Oklahoma legislature has adopted a provision mandating the shifting of fees in derivati [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 7:54 am by Cooper Quintin and Dave Maass
Building off Freamon’s work, a team of computer scientists at the University of Arizona dug further into the data and found vulnerable cameras in Washington, California, Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Virginia, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:00 pm by Nancy E. Halpern, DVM, Esq.
Likewise, offspring are significant and enriching to groups of animals, especially for species that depend on extensive social contact and cooperation. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:44 pm by Mark Walsh
Gross, about death-penalty procedures in Oklahoma. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:13 am
Estate of Greenfield, 859 P.2d 1101 (Oklahoma Supreme Court 1993); Oklahoma Statutes title 15, § 153.Walker v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 7:23 am by Lorene Park
For example, a federal court in Oklahoma found evidence that an employee’s demotion was due to race discrimination based on the fact that African-American employees were required to turn over their computers during an independent forensic expert’s investigation into violations of a computer use policy (viewing porn at work) while some white employees did not have to turn theirs over (Crabbe v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 3:29 pm by Lorene Park
For example: Although a car dealership cooperated with the NRLB in an investigation over its 2010 handbook provisions on social media, gave the NLRB proposed revisions, and issued a new 2013 handbook after the agency’s review, the Board, in a 2-1 decision found that publication of the new handbook did not effectively repudiate the offending provisions. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 10:40 am by Jeff Redding
In the well-known 2005 precedent, Minister of Home Affairs v. [read post]