Search for: "Cooper v. Oklahoma" Results 101 - 120 of 176
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Court found that Regulation 3 does not carry the force of law (see Weiss v. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The Mishcon blog has a post “Regulatory Cooperation and Information sharing” concerning a former director banned by the insolvency service after an ICO penalty in relation to the sending of unsolicited SMS messages. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 12:27 am by legalinformatics
McCann, Wayne State Univ: Between Thugs and Innocents: Racialized Violence and the Perogative of ‘Self Defense’ in the Trayvon Martin Case Robert Mills, Northwestern University: The Harmonious Vocalics of Judicial Unanimity: Authorship and Legitimacy in Cooper v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 3:02 am
The Supreme Court established the constitutional basis for using paid informants in 1966 with U.S. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 7:23 am by Lorene Park
For example, a federal court in Oklahoma found evidence that an employee’s demotion was due to race discrimination based on the fact that African-American employees were required to turn over their computers during an independent forensic expert’s investigation into violations of a computer use policy (viewing porn at work) while some white employees did not have to turn theirs over (Crabbe v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
The appeal contends the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act shields foreign companies from having to cooperate with U.S. criminal investigations. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 8:43 am
”He referred to NCAA v. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 10:50 pm by Jarod Bona
Significantly—at least to me—on the Tenth Circuit, Judge Gorsuch wrote the opinion in Kay Electric Cooperative v. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 10:50 pm by Jarod Bona
Significantly—at least to me—on the Tenth Circuit, Judge Gorsuch wrote the opinion in Kay Electric Cooperative v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Julia Spiegel
Supreme Court’s 2006 decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]