Search for: "Cooper v. People" Results 61 - 80 of 3,094
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2015, 11:48 am
One evaluator also opined: “[Defendant] is extremely rigid, and as long as his views of circumstances of the world is [sic] listened to, he is calm and cooperative. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
Existing law requires a cooperative corporation to include in its name the word “cooperative. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 12:50 pm
The Feb. 26, 2007 ruling of Bosnia and Herzegovina v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 1:54 pm
Okay, so I'll take that last comment -- intended or not -- as a (perhaps entirely deserved) slam on people who include myself. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 2:47 am
Nonetheless, the 9th notes, people change beliefs. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 5:25 am
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: People v Mcgourty [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:31 am
Leslie Salt Co. (1969) 70 Cal.2d 627, 636 (Cooper); see People ex rel. [read post]
20 May 2011, 11:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Of course, this case may be difficult in the current political context: for example, the politics of Roe v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:04 am by Donald Thompson
Bagely, 473 U.S. 667 [1985]), as well as full details concerning any cooperation agreement between the government and a witness (People v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 3:16 pm
In Spanish, appellant uttered profanities, asked appellant if he was “a faggot,” said words to the effect that he should have more respect for people from Jalisco (a state in Mexico).Then -- still in Spanish -- appellant said, “I should kill you. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 10:16 am by Kent Scheidegger
Whether the California Legislature can forbid chartered local governments from protecting their people from alien criminals by cooperating with their deportation is a pending question of state constitutional law. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 1:20 am
He holds services in his home which are attended each week by ten to 15 people. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
When there is evidence of real risk of such violence—for instance, possible physical retaliation against people who cooperated with the government[21] or risk of violence against an asylum seeker in his home country[22]—courts do indeed generally allow pseudonymity, entirely apart from whether the violence stems from religious views.[23] The same would apply to people who fear religion-related violence, as in Doe v. [read post]