Search for: "Cooper v. Smith" Results 21 - 40 of 667
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2024, 5:50 am by Janet Lord
In contemporary times, more sophisticated syndicates target persons with disabilities for economic exploitation, as in the case of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 5:48 am by Bernard Bell
Invalidating all of Jack Smith’s actions could derail cooperation agreements, plea deals, or declinations of prosecution non-defendants entered into with a special counsel who they reasonably believed possessed of appropriate authority. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:05 am by Brian Finucane
With his decision to end his bid for a second term, President Biden may now be considering how to cement his presidential legacy. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
And time and again, those courts determined that the transactions at issue—ranging from investment opportunities in oil barrels to fishing boats to silver foxes—did in fact constitute the offer or sale of securities.[8] And then in 1946, the Supreme Court issued its seminal opinion in SEC v. [read post]
6 Jul 2024, 1:38 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
The proposed tort in Smith v Fonterra with reference to France and the Netherlands Paula Leskinen, Antti Belinskij, & Sanna-Riikka Saarela, Integrating climate change into legislative drafting: An analysis of regulatory impact assessment obligations and practices in the EU and Finland Saga Eriksson, The centrality of law for EU sustainable finance markets: Outlining a research agenda Wen Duan, Area-based management tools under the BBNJ Agreement: Ambition or illusion?… [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 1:06 pm by Randy E. Barnett
(2015) Michael Paulsen & Luke Paulsen, The Constitution: An Introduction (2015) Thomas Leonard, Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics, and American Economics in the Progressive Era (2016) Tara Smith, Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System (2015) Ilya Somin, The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Whether that’s explaining how we’re thinking about penalties, disgorgement and remedies; highlighting enforcement initiatives; discussing legal developments; or outlining the many ways in which we are encouraging and rewarding cooperation; this type of dialogue benefits all of us. [read post]