Search for: "Cooper v. State Bar (1987)" Results 61 - 80 of 88
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
  "This, in part, might reflect the common culture of law school course pedagogy, in which the utility of a course directed in the short term to the bar and in the middle term to the first job, is an important way that students weigh the value of a course (and therefore the amount of time that ought to be devoted to its mastery." [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm by Kevin Russell and Charles Davis
(remanding for full hearing on equitable tolling); Cooper v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am by Steve Lombardi
The long-standing rule in this state bars the recovery of punitive damages when the tortfeasor dies before judgment. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
(2) Does the ICCTA preempt a state agency’s voluntary commitments to comply with CEQA as a condition of receiving state funds for a state owned rail line and/or leasing state-owned property? [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:19 pm by Zuri Blackmon
For example, if you ask a state tax officer when were the assessments? [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:16 am by Marty Lederman
  On April 30, not even a half-year after Richard Nixon’s overwhelming re-election, the President fired his White House Counsel, John Dean, who had begun to cooperate with the Senate Select Committee investigating Watergate. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 10:32 am by Michael Oykhman
Cases such as R v Nygaard, 1989 CanLII 6 (SCC), [1989] 2 SCR 1074, R v Jacquard, 1997 CanLII 374 (SCC), [1997] 1 SCR 314, and R v More, 1963 CanLII 805 (MBCA) have helped us establish notions of what “planned and deliberate” murder entails. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:45 am by Daniel W. Whitney, Esquire
”[24]Bar to FCA LawsuitsA significant limitation on a FCA lawsuit is that it must be based on “original source” information.[25] This means the whistle-blower must have “direct and independent knowledge. [read post]
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]