Search for: "Copeland v. Copeland"
Results 21 - 40
of 209
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2021, 9:05 pm
Amy Lee Copeland, Parnell’s attorney for the Motion 2255 hearing, has filed a motion uncontested by government attorneys to permit Bondurant to appear and testify at the evidentiary hearing by video teleconference. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 9:06 pm
Another Explanation of Justice Gorsuch’s Bostock Vote July 22, 2020 | Charlton Copeland, University of Miami How did we get a 6-3 vote from arguably the most conservative Supreme Court of the last 100 years? [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 2:51 pm
"Josiah v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 2:51 pm
"Josiah v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm
Two of Georgia’s most accomplished appellate attorneys, Savannah’s Amy Lee Copeland and Atlanta’s Amy Levin Weil, are representing Parnell in the motion hearing. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 7:25 am
Lynch, Rhonda V. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 5:09 am
In an essay for The Regulatory Review’s annual Supreme Court series, Charlton Copeland argues that Justice Neil Gorsuch’s battle against the Chevron doctrine played a role in his decision in Bostock v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Bostock v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:03 pm
The majority’s rule in Seila Law v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 7:48 am
Twitter * Eighth Lawsuit Against Social Media Providers for “Materially Supporting Terrorists” Fails–Copeland v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 3:58 am
On appeal from [2019] EWCA Crim 36. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 2:49 am
On Wednesday 11 March 2020, the Court will hand-down judgment in R v Copeland. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 7:01 pm
State v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 8:13 am
Below is our quarterly newsletter. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 8:40 am
Twitter * Eighth Lawsuit Against Social Media Providers for “Materially Supporting Terrorists” Fails–Copeland v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 8:39 am
• Frank V. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 1:04 pm
Google, Doe v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:27 pm
Copeland v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:48 pm
Copeland v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 6:49 am
Twitter and Copeland v. [read post]
