Search for: "Copperweld v. Independence Tube" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2009, 8:00 am
Independence Tube Corp., in which the high court had held that a tubing company and its wholly-owned subsidiary comprised just one entity for antitrust purposes. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 2:09 pm by David Garcia and Helen C. Eckert
Independence Tube Corp., 467 U.S. 752 (a parent and its wholly-owned subsidiary are incapable of conspiring under Section 1); Texaco Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 1:22 pm by Michael McCann
Independence Tube Corporation, 467 U.S. 752 (1984). [read post]
29 May 2010, 7:49 pm
(Copperweld Corp v Independence Tube Corp (1984)). [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 8:04 am
Independence Tube Corp, in which the high court had held that a tubing company and its wholly-owned subsidiary comprised just one entity for antitrust purposes. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 12:58 am
  The court thus extended the rationale of Copperweld Corp. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:38 pm
Although some common ownership existed between Beta and Beatport, it was not sufficient to warrant dismissal under Copperweld Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 2:30 pm by dbmadmin
Independence Tube Corp., and much of the opinion was a reiteration of prior cases. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 1:14 am by Florian Mueller
Independence Tube: "independent centers of decisionmaking"--a term that still lacks clarityIt's been almost four decades since the Supreme Court explained in Copperweld that the law "treat[s] concernted behavior more strictly than unilateral behavior" because concerted activity (Section 1) "deprives the marketplace of the independent centers of decisionmaking that competition assumes and demands. [read post]