Search for: "Cork v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 113
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2007, 3:14 pm
NUI Cork T/A Cork University Press [2000] IEHC 70 and Sweeney v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 12:22 pm
Robinson v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 2:28 am
Champagne corks may have been popping in Chancery Lane last night, but the success of the Law Society in its challenge to the Legal Services Commission’s family tender process is no more than a small victory in a war that cannot be won.As the UK Human Rights Blog states, the decision "may only serve to delay the inevitable ... with the system of legal aid under enormous budgetary pressure". [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 2:31 pm
Utah and later clarified in Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 8:11 am
Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc., Individually and as Successor to Mundet Cork Corporation, Respondent. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 6:54 am
Utah, 414 U.S. 538 (1974), and Crown Cork & Seal v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 7:25 am
On June 16, 2013, E. left Kinsale, County Cork, Ireland with Respondent for a summer visit to the United States. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 11:30 am
K&D, LLC v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:51 am
Gasque v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 8:09 am
The article discusses the Texas Supreme Court's recent opinion in Robinson v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 2:13 am
Today the United Kingdom's Court of Appeal (Civil Division) released its judgment in AS & DD v Secretary of State for the Home Department, which concerned the lawfulness of the deportation of the applicant to Libya, pursuant to a Memorandum of Understanding with the proposed receiving state. [read post]
13 Jan 2018, 8:00 pm
Consider Hanberry v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 10:32 am
Utah (1974) 414 U.S. 538 (American Pipe) and Crown, Cork & Seal Co., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 12:18 pm
Of Pharmacy v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 8:18 am
(citing Darin v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:41 am
The invention in Hallen was a cork-screw coated with a friction-reducing material. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 5:28 am
The Court referred here to the well-known UK authority in Hallen v Brabantia where it was held that a patent to a PTFE coated cork-screw was obvious because it was obvious that the PTFE coating would achieve betting penetration of the corkscrew into the cork, and the fact that it unexpectedly achieved an improvement to the pulling of the cork would not found a valid patent; (x) In relation to dosage regimen patents, the Court reiterated that there is no blanket… [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
In Montoya v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 5:32 am
See Hurrell-Harring v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
In NML Capital v Argentina, the question for the Supreme Court was whether one such investor, a New York fund that bought into Argentinian bonds which were subsequently defaulted, could enforce its judgment against assets of the Argentinian state in the United Kingdom. [read post]
