Search for: "Cornell v. Cornell" Results 1 - 20 of 2,174
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2011, 6:26 am by Ezra Rosser
 Earlier coverage includes Melissa Harris-Perry, “Cornell West v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 12:33 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Hearsay — Statements by victim A jury sitting the Circuit Court for Montgomery County found Cornell Young, appellant, guilty of one count of sexual abuse of a minor and two counts of second-degree sexual offense. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:30 pm by Tom Smith
Twenty-three Cornell law professors filed a motion last month to submit an amicus brief in the case of John Doe v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 2:55 am
The Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments in the latest incarnation of Philip Morris v. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 5:20 am by SHG
But there were few things he thought more highly of than Eugene V. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 7:50 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- Last month in Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 8:21 am by Alfred Brophy
Saul Cornell and Nathan Kozuskanich's edited volume, The Second Amendment on Trial: Critical Essays on District of Columbia v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 11:36 pm
The School of Industrial Relations at Cornell University may have discriminated against a professor on the basis of age and gender, the Second Circuit has ruled in a decision which fleshes out the legal framework for resolving these cases and remands this case for trial.The case is Liebowitz v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 5:45 am by Cornell Law Review
Cornell Law Review, Volume 95 Number 2 (January 2010) Articles Environmental Law as a Legal Field: An Inquiry in Legal Taxonomy Todd S. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 12:45 pm by Cornell Law Review
Cornell Law Review, Volume 95 Issue 6 (September 2010) Articles Refining the Democracy Canon Christopher S. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 11:18 am by Cornell Law Review
Beekman A Role for the Judiciary in Reforming Executive Compensation: The Implications of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]