Search for: "Cortez v. People" Results 1 - 20 of 93
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2010, 3:53 pm
The first sentence of this opinion reads:"Octavio Reyes Cortez pleaded guilty to six counts of committing lewd acts upon a child (Pen. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:14 pm
  Not "ha-ha" funny, but instead, slightly remarkable (or at least worth notice).It reads:  "Defendant and appellant, Anthony Esparza Cortez, Jr., a convicted felon, and his friend, Michael Saavedra, conspired to commit murder against Rene Perez, and his sonin-law, Alvino Barrera. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 3:05 pm
"When a court recalls a felony sentence and imposes a misdemeanor sentence pursuant to Penal Code section 1170.18, subdivision (a) (Proposition 47), may the court revisit the sentence imposed on other misdemeanor counts, not subject to Proposition 47, and impose a harsher punishment? [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 5:12 pm
If you're in jail, and I'm your attorney, please do not send things to me in envelope marked "Legal Mail" if they have previously been up your butt. [read post]
27 May 2012, 11:42 am by Madelaine Lane
  The Court also remanded People v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 11:54 am
(Why can't we treat these people any better, you might ask? [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 4:11 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 In the process, the intermediate appellate court touched on the nerve of an accused's right to have legal counsel prior to making statements to police.In People v Cortez, the defendant, a prisoner at Carson City, underwent a cell shake-down which yielded two shanks from around his bunk. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 6:01 pm by Sam Brunson
As recently as 2012, though, the Supreme Court reiterated (in NFIB v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 4:36 am by SHG
The first time that the State petitioned this Court to review the Seventh Court of Appeals’s unanimous decision affirming the trial court’s order granting Cortez’s motion to suppress, this Court vacated the decision of the court of appeals and remanded the case for reconsideration under Heien v. [read post]