Search for: "Costa v. Costa"
Results 1 - 20
of 962
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2015, 9:20 am
Costa Rica sued Nicaragua and Nicaragua sued Costa Rica in a dispute about their border. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 2:41 pm
The court ruled (inter alia) that Costa Rican tourist and commercial boats have the right to travel along... [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 5:04 pm
Costa Rica, having beat El Salvador two days ago, just defeated Honduras a few minutes ago to win the championship for the Central American Cup (Copa Centroamericana). [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 12:32 pm
Territorial and Maritime Dispute (Nicaragua v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 7:30 am
We covered earlier the cert. grant in Krupski v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:57 am
Costa Rica initiated this case in November... [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:57 am
Costa Rica initiated this case in November... [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 7:35 pm
Costa v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 11:49 am
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) issued an Order regarding Provisional Measures today in Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 3:56 pm
In Perry v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 10:36 am
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) announced that it has consolidated two pending cases: Certain Activities carried out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 7:30 am
Costa Crociere S.p.A (09-337), covered earlier here and here. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 11:53 am
Wilhelmina Warrick v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 1:47 am
Una cuarta vía sería solicitar la devolución de ingresos indebidos ante la administración que cobró las costas procesales. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 5:23 pm
The United States Supreme Court in Shute v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:30 pm
In People v. [read post]
3 May 2015, 7:11 pm
Nicaragua) and the Construction of a Road in Costa Rica along the San Juan River (Nicaragua v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
Due to an error in my HTML, today’s article on Costa v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 11:35 am
In addition, the defendant duly received the summons and presently has the opportunity to defend himself.SEC v. [read post]
