Search for: "Cottrel v. New York" Results 1 - 6 of 6
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
Plaintiffs say that defendants should not be allowed to do this because, despite what the statute says, Congress couldn't have meant to authorize pre-service removal before a plaintiff even has an opportunity to effect service.This has been happening a lot in drug/device cases originally filed in New Jersey because: (1) a lot of big drug/device companies have their headquarters in New Jersey, and (2) a lot of plaintiffs' lawyers view New Jersey state courts and… [read post]