Search for: "Couch v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 278
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2020, 5:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
The tax treatment of dual-income earners in a family comes from social and legal assumptions the tax code makes when evaluating the nature of taxable units. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 2:52 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
USCIS acknowledges in the new memorandum that “neither statutes nor regulations state the maximum allowable time of non-productive status. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
Lustgarten had couched his opinion as a “difficulty believing” the defendant’s record notations, in the appellate court’s view did not merit the sanctions imposed. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 11:17 am by Ashoka Mukpo
After recovering he went into hiding, and in 2016 he decided to flee to the United States. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 6:11 am by Chris Wesner
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON In re: GYPC, INC., Debtor Case No. 17‐31030 Adv. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:24 am by John Jascob
Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass), and the Shareholders United Act (H.R. 936), sponsored by Rep. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
DOL Proposes New Electronic Distribution Rule Errors in ACA Penalty Assessments Require Prompt Employer Action New Health Care Design Opportunity for Large Employers: Individual HRAs Newly Proposed Health Insurance Cost and Coverage Transparency Requirements Remedial Amendment Period Closing Soon for Self-Correcting 403(b) Plans IRS Opens Determination Letter Window to Cash Balance and Other Hybrid Plans Final Regulations on 401(k) Hardship Withdrawals Massachusetts Among Several States… [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 7:24 am by Dan Bressler
In 2003, the United States Supreme Court established a six-factor test in Clackamas Gastroenterology Associates, P.C. v. [read post]