Search for: "Couch v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 278
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2013, 9:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
Petitioner was a Canadian citizen, while Respondent and R were United States citizens. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 3:28 am by Robin Shea
Moreover, the courts, including the Supreme Court of the United States, are delighted to enforce arbitration agreements. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 4:39 pm by Ilya Somin
As my colleague Michael Greve points out, during the oral argument Solicitor General Donald Verrilli repeated a mistake that has gotten the federal government into trouble in several previous federalism cases, including United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 8:07 am by Ken White
To its credit, the Supreme Court took only three years to correct itself in West Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 11:52 am by Dominic Draye
In 1952, the Supreme Court took up the case of a soldier who deserted his unit during World War II. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 6:43 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Charles Couch and Couch Oil & Gas, Inc.Case number: 14-cv-01747 (United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas)Case filed: May 12, 2014Qualifying Judgment/Order: May 9, 2016 6/30/2016 9/28/2016 2016-77 SEC v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 10:19 am by Eugene Volokh
Truth was not an absolute defense, and the rationale for the prosecutions was often that such statements insult foreign countries and thus threaten to damage peaceful relations with other countries; for a mix of quotes on the subject as of 1887, see Wharton's Digest of the International Law of the United States. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 1:20 pm by Dennis Crouch
§ 2401(a) ("Except as [otherwise provided], every civil action commenced against the United States shall be barred unless the complaint is filed within six years after the right of action first accrues."). [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 7:36 am by Ken White
United States, which may or may not clarify the difference between "true threats" and speech protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 7:24 am by Dan Bressler
In 2003, the United States Supreme Court established a six-factor test in Clackamas Gastroenterology Associates, P.C. v. [read post]