Search for: "County of Alameda v. City and County of San Francisco"
Results 1 - 20
of 58
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2018, 4:32 am
The case is being litigated on behalf of the People by the County of Santa Clara, the City and County of San Francisco, the County of Alameda, the City of Oakland, the City of San Diego, the County of Los Angeles, the County of Monterey, the County of San Mateo, the County of Solano, and the County of Ventura. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 8:42 am
City & County of San Francisco, 2010 U.S. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 3:25 pm
The cities and counties — Santa Clara County, San Francisco City, Alameda County, Los Angeles County, Monterey County, Oakland City, San Diego City, San Mateo County, Solano County and Ventura County — filed their 52-page statement of decision with the Santa Clara County Superior Court Friday. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 10:10 am
The counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Sonoma and the City of Berkeley have reportedly agreed to follow a similar framework. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 8:07 am
On July 5, the San Francisco Superior Court issued a pair of rulings in favor of the city and county of San Francisco, finding that two local special taxes introduced by voter initiatives were valid even though they passed with a simple majority vote and not a two-thirds supermajority vote. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 11:13 am
Ct.)As readers of this site know, I have been monitoring a lawsuit in Alameda, a San Francisco Bay Area city. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 7:44 am
City & County of San Francisco, C 03-1840, 2006 U.S. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 8:56 am
Agent Carlson then deployed the cell-site simulator – in San Francisco County! [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 2:53 pm
City of San Jose, et al. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 8:53 am
City & County of San Francisco (2002) 27 Cal.4th 643, 670.) [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 3:09 pm
City and County of San Francisco (T-Mobile West Corporation, et al., Real Parties) (July 26, 2012, 1st Dist., Div. 4) ___ Cal.App.4th ___, 2012 WL 2948575. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 3:09 pm
City and County of San Francisco (T-Mobile West Corporation, et al., Real Parties) (July 26, 2012, 1st Dist., Div. 4) ___ Cal.App.4th ___, 2012 WL 2948575. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:48 pm
City & County of San Francisco (9th Cir. 2014). [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 12:26 pm
” Lawsuit Against the City and County of San Francisco In this lawsuit Lacy v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
City and County of San Francisco (2014) 226 Cal.App.4th 1012. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:29 pm
City and County of San Francisco (2014) 226 Cal.App.4th 1012, 1021-1022, and Robinson v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 8:36 am
That is far less common in more recent cases.Alameda County, California is a large county including the City of Oakland and a lot of other areas as well. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am
(A135335, A136212; 218 Cal.App.4th 1171; Alameda County Superior Court; RG10548693.) [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
City and County of San Francisco (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 950: The lead agency correctly applied a Class 3 CEQA exemption to applications for permits to add wireless equipment throughout the City and County of San Francisco. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 11:39 am
In a published opinion filed September 28, 2017, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed the Alameda County Superior Court’s judgment denying appellant Living Rivers Council’s (LRC) writ petition challenging the State Water Resources Control Board’s (the “SWRCB” or “Board”) approval of a policy designed to maintain instream flows in coastal streams north of San Francisco. [read post]
