Search for: "County of Los Angeles v. Commission on State Mandates (1995)"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2011, 1:05 pm
Commission on State Mandates (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 266, 272-274; County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
City of Los Angeles (2007) 153 Cal.App.4th 1385), or is the agency’s decision subject to a threshold determination whether the modification of the project constitutes a “new project altogether,” as a matter of law (Save Our Neighborhood v. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
The EIR related to general planning and conservation steps resulting from Los Angeles County’s prior approval of a 12,000 acre specific plan and neighboring 1500 acre conservation area in Ventura County. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
Over half an hour after the execution began, a doctor wearing a blue hood to cover his face entered the execution chamber to check Angel Diaz's vital signs. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm
Hart In the case of South Orange County Wastewater Authority v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:31 pm
North Coast Railroad Authority (2017) 3 Cal.5th 677, the high court held that CEQA applied to a state public entity’s railroad project on a State-owned rail line as an act of “self-governance,” and was not a preempted “regulation” (i.e., not an “environmental preclearance requirement”) under the Federal Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act of 1995. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
Fish & Game Commission (1997) 16 Cal.4th 105; Health First v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
Fish & Game Commission (1997) 16 Cal.4th 105; Health First v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Fish & Game Commission (1997) 16 Cal.4th 105; Health First v. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
http://j.st/SUL Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
. - Amy Leigh Womack, Macon.com, February 16, 2010 Lawyers representing the city of Jeffersonville and the owners of a Twiggs County hunting plantation have drafted a consent order to try to settle a lawsuit alleging that the city violated the federal Clean Water Act. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 7:26 am
B211398 (Los Angeles County Super. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
Violations were also discovered at companies in Los Angeles, Sun Valley, Compton, Van Nuys and Santa Clara. [read post]
