Search for: "County of Los Angeles v. Security Ins. Co."
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2020, 11:22 pm
In the October 23, 2020 issue of the Los Angeles Daily Journal, the Daily Journal published an article written by the McKennon Law Group PC’s Robert J. [read post]
7 May 2014, 3:34 pm
Co., v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 12:33 pm
http://www.kantorlaw.net/documents/59-Mondolo-13-01-17-Findings-of-Fact-Order.pdf Our client, a resident of Los Angeles County, was suffering from fibromyalgia and avascular necrosis (aka bone death, believed to be a result of leukemia treatment). [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 2:15 pm
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Rupert A. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 6:47 am
Co., 19 No. 38 Andrews Ins. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:41 am
Coverage comes from Adam Liptak in The New York Times, David Savage in the Los Angeles Times, Greg Stohr at Bloomberg, and Daniel Fisher at Forbes, who notes that the decision “further strengthens the once-controversial Supreme Court doctrine extending First Amendment protection to corporate, as opposed to individual speech. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 4:48 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am
Under the contracts, Miracle Star provided drug and alcohol services to qualified Los Angeles County residents, and billed COLA monthly. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 4:26 pm
(Los Angeles County Super. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
CAFA has prompted a flurry of single-state class actions filed in state courts, and recent statistics show that in at least one forum favored by the plaintiffs’ bar (Los Angeles), state class action filings continue to grow. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Childs, No. 071495, 071597 Convictions for conspiracy to commit murder for hire resulting death are affirmed over claims that the district court erred by: 1) denying defendant's Rule 29 motion for acquittal; 2) allowing witness to testify to an out-of-court statement made by indicted co-conspirator; 3) requiring one defendant to testify under a statutory grant of use immunity at his co-defendant's trial; 4) failing to order one defendant, over his attorney's… [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 7:50 pm
Co. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Rule 8(b) and Rule 14; and 2) the government violated Brady, when it failed to produce arguably exculpatory evidence with respect to a charged co-conspirator until the week of trial. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 11:33 pm
The Board also adopted the judges' finding that a Gissel bargaining order was necessary and warranted under NLRB v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:43 am
B227360 (Los Angeles County Super. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
No. 30-2009-003090696)O P I N I O NOriginal proceedings; petition for a writ of mandate to challenge an order ofthe Superior Court of Orange County, David C. [read post]
