Search for: "County of Santa Clara v. Superior Court" Results 61 - 80 of 172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2014, 4:00 am by Dianne Saxe
 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Case No. 1-00-CV-788657 Could this happen in Canada? [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 6:00 am by Wystan M. Ackerman
Superior Ct., Santa Clara County, Mar. 18, 2013), the plaintiffs allege that State Farm failed to comply with a California statute and regulation with respect to adjustment of personal property (contents) claims, by failing to take into account the actual condition of contents items in calculating depreciation. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 2:40 pm by Shahram Miri
Hugill (2016) ___ Cal.App.4th _____  In Santa Clara County Superior Court, a disgruntled beneficiary challenged the validity of a trust amendment citing a lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:15 pm
Which, in three short pages, totally slams the Clerk's Office in Santa Clara County.Here's a snippet:"The actions of the court clerk’s office are quite troubling. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 3:09 am by Jon Gelman
It marked a huge victory for 10 California municipalities — including Los Angeles County, and the cities of San Francisco and San Diego — that will be able to draw on the fund for home inspections and repairs if the ruling holds up.In the 114-page decision, Santa Clara Superior Court Judge James P. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 10:36 am by Eugene Volokh
” Prior to bringing this action, the City should have closely scrutinized the only controlling authority on this issue — County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 2:18 am
By Dave Lanferman On July 11, 2012, the Santa Clara County Superior Court entered a judgment declaring the City of San Jose’s inclusionary housing ordinance to be invalid. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 3:00 pm
Between 2002 and 2004, Solano County Roofing, Inc., a roofing subcontractor, installed metal roofs on three public works of improvement in San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 10:21 pm by Jon Gelman
This article is shared from the latimes.comA Northern California judge Monday ordered three companies to pay $1.1 billion to remove lead-based paint from inside California homes, concluding a 13-year legal case.Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge James P. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 7:00 am by Suzanne Nusbaum
Oracle Corporation trial in the California Superior Court, Santa Clara County, Case no. 1-11-CV-203163. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 8:53 am by Abbott & Kindermann
(H038563; 216 Cal.App.4th 1373; Santa Clara County Superior Court; 1-10-CV167289.) [read post]
19 May 2007, 7:54 am
I had an op-ed in yesterday's Wall Street Journal ("Tort Travesty") hailing Superior Court Judge Jack Komar's ruling disqualifying private contingency-fee counsel from representing California government entities in lead-paint litigation, and hoping that other courts embrace the decision's logic recognizing... [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 8:00 am
Pfizer Inc., Superior Court, Santa Clara County, California, No. 1-04-CV026653 Pfizer to pay $490.9 million to settle charges of illegal marketing of Rapamune Ropes & Gray United States ex rel. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:43 pm
Supp. 544Westminster School District of Orange County v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 1:22 pm
Stennis to judgeships in the Los Angeles County Superior Court. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 4:28 pm by Steven G. Pearl
County of Santa Clara (2003) 111 Cal.App.4th 671, 681 ["ordinary litigation costs are recoverable by a prevailing FEHA defendant even if the lawsuit was not frivolous, groundless, or unreasonable"] and Knight v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 9:28 am by Abbott & Kindermann
(B245131; 224 Cal.App.4th 1105; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BS131347.) [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 3:39 am by Jon Gelman
Today's post was shared by Legal Newsline and comes from Kleinberg Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge James Kleinberg on Thursday praised lawyers prosecuting and defending a 13-year-old lead paint public nuisance case after both sides rested at trial. [read post]