Search for: "County of Santa Clara v. Superior Court" Results 141 - 160 of 221
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2010, 8:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Apple's Cupertino headquarters is in Santa Clara County, about 40 miles south of San Francisco.In Apple's favor is a California statute on lost property: any person who finds lost property and knows who the owner is likely to be but "appropriates such property to his own use" is guilty of theft.On the flip side, the US Supreme Court in Bartnicki v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 11:51 am by Cal Law
 Randall Scarlett, for his $49 million brain injury verdict (free reg. req.) in Santa Clara County Superior Court. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 5:30 am
This case was originally filed in April, 2009, by Ek Vathana in Santa Clara County Superior Court against EverBank surrounding a breach of contract dispute. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
Superior Court (Santa Clara County) (IP Law Blog)   US Patent Reform The Patent Reform Act of 2010: A Substitute S. 515 (Patent Baristas) (Inventive Step) (271 Patent Blog) (IP Watch) (Inventive Step) (Patent Docs) (Gray on Claims) (Patently-O) First to disclose: A caveat to the Patent Reform Act of 2010 (Patently-O) House leadership says it lacked ‘adequate input’ on Senate Patent Reform Bill (Patent Docs) Who cares about health care… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
Superior Court (Santa Clara County) (IP Law Blog)   US Patent Reform The Patent Reform Act of 2010: A Substitute S. 515 (Patent Baristas) (Inventive Step) (271 Patent Blog) (IP Watch) (Inventive Step) (Patent Docs) (Gray on Claims) (Patently-O) First to disclose: A caveat to the Patent Reform Act of 2010 (Patently-O) House leadership says it lacked ‘adequate input’ on Senate Patent Reform Bill (Patent Docs) Who cares about health care… [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 9:02 am
Superior Court (Santa Clara County), the Court faced the issue of whether a bankrupt company could maintain an action for trade secret misappropriation when that company had sold its “trade secrets” in connection with the bankruptcy. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 5:00 pm by Cal Law
The California Supreme Court today denied the Santa Clara-based company’s petition for review and stay, meaning trial will proceed in the suit filed by Jasmine Networks Inc. in Santa Clara County Superior Court. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 7:06 am by Moseley Collins
Superior Court of Santa Clara County (2004) 117 Cal.App.4th 72, the Court held that the mere inference that the defendant had consciously disregarded a resident's safety raised a triable issue of fact concerning the reckless neglect element of an elder abuse claim. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 7:06 am by Moseley Collins
Superior Court of Santa Clara County (2004) 117 Cal.App.4th 72, the Court held that the mere inference that the defendant had consciously disregarded a resident's safety raised a triable issue of fact concerning the reckless neglect element of an elder abuse claim. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Superior Court, 39 Cal.3d 740 (1985)) (also central to the County of Santa Clara case), and approved a contingency-fee arrangement between the City of Anaheim and private lawyers in a case to recover unpaid city tax assessments. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 11:54 am
 The Santa Clara County Superior Court(Komar, J.), applying Delaware law, sustained defendants’ demurrer to plaintiff’s sixth amended complaint, without leave to amend, holding that plaintiff had failed to adequately plead (1) demand futility, (2) that the proxy statement was false or misleading and (3) facts sufficient to constitute a direct cause of action. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Santa Clara Valley Water Dist. (2009) 170 Cal.App.4th 956, the court addressed the use of an exemption (Public Resources Code section 21080(b)(8)) for rate setting for groundwater extraction charges. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
December 14, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 2:42 pm by Bruce Nye
Superior Court of Santa Clara County (1962) 57 Cal. 2d 450 , every trial court in California can follow either rule. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 4:37 am
Los Angeles County Court Locations LOCATIONS BY NAME Airport Courthouse 11701 S. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 6:54 am
Superior Court of Santa Clara County (1962) 57 Cal. 2d 450, every trial court in the state is free to choose between them. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 4:54 pm
Superior Court of Santa Clara County (1962) 57 Cal. 2d 450, every trial court in the state is required to follow this unless another court of appeal reaches a contrary decision or the Supreme Court grants a hearing (in which case the decision immediately becomes unciteable). [read post]