Search for: "Course v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 33,904
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2008, 9:07 am
GO and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “Overseas students could change their courses but if they wanted an extension of stay in the United Kingdom, they had to be able to produce evidence of satisfactory progress, whether on the course named in the application for entry clearance or on another recognised course. [read post]
8 May 2009, 2:55 am
R (James) v Secretary of State for Justice (Parole Board intervening); R (Lee) v Same (Same intervening); R (Wells) v Same (Same intervening) (on appeal from R (Walker) v Same (Same intervening)) [2009] UKHL 22; [2009] WLR (D) 145 “The failure of the Secretary of State for Justice to provide courses to enable prisoners serving indeterminate [...] [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 10:17 am by immigrationprof
Last week, SCOTUS blog published an on-line symposium on S.B. 1070 and United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 6:38 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Closing argument by state — Disparaging defense counsel A jury sitting in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County convicted the appellant, Henry Umana, of a continuing course of sexual abuse of C.T. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 6:19 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Closing argument by state — Facts not in evidence A jury in the Circuit Court for Carroll County convicted Matthew A. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
We are planning a series of posts on the DC Circuit's decision in Business Roundtable v. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 7:54 am by Amy Howe
Next week the justices are scheduled to hear oral argument in Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 2:52 am by sally
Secretary of State for the Home Department v CB and another [2012] EWCA Civ 418; [2012] WLR (D) 112 “Where a court made a non-derogating control order in proceedings against a person under the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005, it had no jurisdiction to order a permanent stay of such proceedings under the Act nor under its case management powers in the Civil Procedure Rules, unless the controlled person requested such a course of action.” WLR Daily, 3rd April… [read post]