Search for: "Courtenay Brinckerhoff"
Results 1 - 20 of 79
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2012, 12:57 pm by Taylor Corbitt
~Courtenay Brinckerhoff When the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Patient... [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 10:45 am
Over at PharmaPatents, Courtenay Brinckerhoff has a post "Pharma Cases Dominate New USPTO Obviousness Examination Guidelines." [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 8:42 pm by Patent Docs
A panel consisting of Robert Bahr, Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy, USPTO; Courtenay Brinckerhoff of Foley & Lardner LLP; and Kurtis MacFerrin of Google, Inc. will discuss the final rules and when a patent holder would be well advised to ask for supplemental examination, balancing the risks and benefits. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 9:45 pm by Patent Docs
The panel will include Courtenay Brinckerhoff of Foley & Lardner, Charles Doyle of Roche Molecular Systems, and Prof. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:22 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Today isn't entirely without some commentary on the America Invents Act as we continue to see Foley & Lardner's Courtenay Brinckerhoff cover that topic like the gray clouds blanketing Seattle but, for a change of pace, the biggest story today is the FTC's proposed changes to the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule; Nicole Friess and Andy Serwin have the story. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 5:50 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Today, Courtenay Brinckerhoff has an examination of key patent issues to watch for in 2015. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Also in today’s roundup: Al Saikali breaking down the FTC’s $22.5 million fine against Google and Courtenay Brinckerhoff continuing her superb commentary on the America Invents Act. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 1:30 pm by Anthony McCain
John White: Curing The PTAB: How 3 Fixes Will Make A Better, Fairer Process Sasha Moss: Kraft Case A Reminder That Congress Should Enact Patent System Reform Eun-Young Jeong: Qualcomm Faces $853 Million Fine From South Korea Over Alleged Antitrust Violations Courtenay Brinckerhoff: District Court Dismisses USPTO December 2015 Holidays Case Danielle Muoio: Faraday Future Does Not Own Its Intellectual Property Joseph Herndon: Kayak Software v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 9:55 pm by Patent Docs
Donald Zuhn of McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP will moderate panel including Courtenay Brinckerhoff of Foley & Lardner LLP and Dr. [read post]
21 May 2016, 8:41 pm by Patent Docs
Patent and Trademark Office, Courtenay Brinckerhoff of Foley & Lardner, and Kevin Noonan of McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP will probe deeply into the new examples published by the USPTO this month that show how claims for life science inventions should be examined by the agency for subject-matter patent eligibility. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 9:30 pm by Patent Docs
A panel consisting of Courtenay Brinckerhoff of Foley & Lardner; Duane Marks of Roche; and Raul Tamayo, senior legal advisor in the U.S. [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 8:49 pm by Patent Docs
Courtenay Brinckerhoff of Foley & Lardner, LLP; Ronald J. [read post]
9 May 2015, 8:51 pm by Patent Docs
Courtenay Brinckerhoff of Foley & Lardner, Michelle Macartney of Intellectual Ventures, and Thomas Rozylowicz of Fish & Richardson will give tips for patent claim and specification drafting that can go a long way to bullet-proofing a patent, as well as advice on savvy prosecution strategy using declarations, continuation applications, reexamination, and reissue. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 7:23 pm by Patent Docs
Courtenay Brinckerhoff of Foley & Lardner; Matthew Dowd of Wiley Rein, LLP; and Mary Till, USPTO Office of Patent Legal Administration will cover evidentiary declarations under the First Inventor to File (FITF) system, including declarations relating to the 1-year grace period under the new section 102(b), explain Rule 132 declarations and other evidence to overcome obviousness rejections, and demonstrate how to avoid common pitfalls that can... [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 8:46 pm by Patent Docs
Swize of Jones Day and Courtenay C. [read post]