Search for: "Covarrubias v. State"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2011, 2:54 pm
Stating that he had never come across anyone in his lengthy experience in law enforcement who was actually a blind mule, even though many of them claimed to be.That seems obviously improper to me. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 8:40 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2007, 9:32 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 10:47 am
South Africa is the first Member State that has adopted a customised version of the WIPO manual on this topic. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 6:36 am
United States v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 11:45 am
Sometimes it doesn't pay to be a truthful person.Take Neftali Urzua Covarrubias, for example. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 7:33 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 1:25 pm
Supreme Court precedent set in Lockhard v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 1:28 pm
Marie-Andree Weiss of The 1709 Blog discusses the Paramount Pictures Corp. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 1:13 pm
The verbal description of the mark states: "The mark consists of a three dimensional ivory-coloured tile on the top surface of which is shown a letter of the Roman alphabet and a number in the range of 1 to 10". [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 6:03 am
” Plaintiff’s “entire argument” was based on his interpretation of Covarrubias v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:55 pm
" is the title of Patricia Covarrubia's post on IP Tango about latest news from Brazil. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 3:05 pm
Finally, on IP Tango, Patricia Covarrubia marks the first birthday of Mexico's membership of the Madrid Protocol on international trade mark registration. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 9:51 pm
Afro-IP gives you the chance to read all 367 pages of Rwanda's new state-of-the-art IP law. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm
Covarrubias v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 5:44 am
The only exception here is the bits of ACTA that deal with criminal sanctions which, says the Commision require ratification by the individual Member States. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:10 am
On the subject of ethics, there's good news for practitioners of espionage -- if they happen to be in the United States, that is. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm
IPSO 07567-21 Ranger v Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (201), No breach – after investigation 07566-21 Ranger v Telegraph.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation 06518-21 Extinction Rebellion v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy, No breach – after investigation 06401-21 League Against Cruel Sports v The Sunday Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation 05940-21 Cygnet Health Care Ltd and Dr Tony Romero v… [read post]
