Search for: "Cox v. Cox" Results 1 - 20 of 1,599
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2024, 5:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The plaintiffs’ claims regarding the consequences and damages flowing from the defendants’ alleged failure to request that a title company provide a title report by a certain date are conclusory and speculative (see May Dock Lane, LLC v Harras Bloom & Archer, LLP, 222 AD3d at 637; 126 Main St., LLC v Kriegsman, 218 AD3d 524, 525; Sierra Holdings, LLC v Phillips, Weiner, Quinn, Artura & Cox, 112 AD3d 909, 910). [read post]
25 Nov 2024, 7:49 am by Amy Howe
There is no deadline for the government to file its briefs in the two related cases, Cox Communications v. [read post]
22 Nov 2024, 10:46 am by Joshua Fox and Michael Kratochvil
SpaceX’s lengthy forum battle landed it on appeal before the Fifth Circuit, which is significant because SpaceX’s constitutional arguments were derived in part from the Fifth Circuit’s decision in Jarkesy v. [read post]
7 Nov 2024, 2:30 pm by Doug Cornelius
Jennifer Duggins, Assistant Director and Co-Head of the Private Funds Unit, SEC, Division of Examinations, New York Regional Office (Moderator) Shane Cox, Regulatory Counsel, SEC, Division of Examinations, Private Funds Unit, Philadelphia Regional Office Lee A. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 6:39 am by Marty Lederman
In an article here back in July, I explained why Judge Cannon is wrong and why the Supreme Court was correct to hold in United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 4:15 am by Steve Brachmann
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s ruling on secondary liability in the billion-dollar copyright infringement case between Sony Music Entertainment and Cox Communications. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 4:15 am by Steve Brachmann
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s ruling on secondary liability in the billion-dollar copyright infringement case between Sony Music Entertainment and Cox Communications. [read post]
18 Sep 2024, 11:32 am by Mills & Mills LLP
Jewish National Fund is taking the CRA to court over plan to revoke its charitable status | CBC News; Jewish National Fund plans appeal of CRA decision on charitable status | National Post ︎In re Cox / Baker v National Trust, 1952 CanLII 13 (SCC) at p 98, [1953] 1 SCR 94. ︎Vancouver Society of Immigrant and Visible Minority Women v MNR, [1999] 1 SCR 10 at paras 159, 203. ︎At Mills & Mills LLP, our lawyers regularly help clients with… [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
On this basis, it does not seem to me that a serious harm test would fail the rationality standard of review set out by Finlay CJ in Tuohy v Courtney (above). [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:57 am by Bernard Bell
Yellen Archibald Cox, left, Senator Edward Kennedy, fourth from left, attending Buckley v. [read post]