Search for: "Cox v. Cox" Results 1 - 20 of 1,797
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2023, 7:46 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Linden J heard the trial of a preliminary issue in the libel case of Evans v McMahon and Kerr J heard an appeal in the case of Samuels v Laycock. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Vitulli’s alleged misconduct in advising the plaintiffs to sell the commercial property to Joseph Vitulli, Jr., since any injury from that misconduct is speculative (see Janker v Silver, Forrester & Lesser, P.C., 135 AD3d 908, 910; Sierra Holdings, LLC v Phillips, Weiner, Quinn, Artura & Cox, 112 AD3d 909, 910; Plymouth Org., Inc. v Silverman, Collura & Chernis, P.C., 21 AD3d 464, 465). [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am by INFORRM
On 24 March 2023, there was a hearing in the case of Hayden v Family Education Trust. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 8:00 am by Erin Sutton
The bill currently awaits Governor Spencer Cox’s signature and would take effect sixty (60) days after its signing.[1] Originally enacted in 2010, the Online Prescribing Act has allowed health care providers to register with the State to prescribe and dispense certain FDA-approved drugs via online pharmacies and utilization of telehealth visits. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 11:36 am by Josh Richman
Christopher Cox, co-authors of Section 230 Background on Gonzalez v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Regulation S-K Item 402(v), the most recent disclosure requirement set forth in August 2022, requires the tabulation of more granular compensation details, stock returns, peer returns, and other performance measures. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 6:07 pm by admin
We estimated adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to quantify associations between hair product use and uterine cancer using Cox proportional hazard models. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 12:24 pm by Giles Peaker
Anchor Hanover Group v Cox (2023) UKUT 14 (LC) (Copy of judgment here. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 5:53 am by Eugene R. Fidell
Although they have attracted less attention, the military justice provisions (found in division A, title V, subtitle E) are important, not only in their own right but also for what they may portend for the future and for what they unfortunately omit. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 10:32 am by Michael Oykhman
Cases such as R v Nygaard, 1989 CanLII 6 (SCC), [1989] 2 SCR 1074, R v Jacquard, 1997 CanLII 374 (SCC), [1997] 1 SCR 314, and R v More, 1963 CanLII 805 (MBCA) have helped us establish notions of what “planned and deliberate” murder entails. [read post]