Search for: "Cox v. Cox" Results 201 - 220 of 1,842
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Jordan Brunner
Christopher Cox in a letter dated Aug. 13, 1999, that the Defense Department would comply (though he also cautioned that such a requirement might be inconsistent with existing law regarding civil liberties protections for U.S. persons). [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 9:30 am by Jason Rantanen
  In this guest post he provides his observations of the damages testimony in VLSI Technologies v. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 7:24 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The standard set by the Ontario Court of Appeal in Crits v. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 2:39 pm by Unknown
Cox (Tribal Corporate Entities; Sovereign Immunity) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.html Walker E. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
I'm continue to serialize my forthcoming UC Davis Law Review article What Cheap Speech Has Done: (Greater) Equality and Its Discontents; you can read the Introduction, but in this post I'm talking about how "cheap speech" has brought back criminal remedies for libel. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 12:44 pm
Artisanal and small-scale mining in Liberia and Sierra Leone Irene Vélez-Torres & Diego Lugo-Vivas, Slow violence and corporate greening in the war on drugs in Colombia McKenzie F Johnson, Fighting for black stone: extractive conflict, institutional change and peacebuilding in Sierra Leone Tobias Ide, Lisa R Palmer, & Jon Barnett, Environmental peacebuilding from below: customary approaches in Timor-Leste Mirza Sadaqat Huda, An ecological response to ethno-nationalistic… [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 10:00 am by Unknown
Diamond OA: "L’Aventure Libyenne et ses Vécus Politiques et Sécuritaires pour les Migrants Maliens," Anthropologie & Développement, no. 51 (2020)- Author = Mali Note: This is a delayed OA journal; articles will become OA after six months. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 2:53 am by INFORRM
Our previous  Trump v Twitter piece explained how s.230 gives both a shield and a sword to online providers like Twitter and Facebook, providing not only (1) that no provider shall be treated as the publisher of information provided by another (thereby protecting providers, as supposed mere platforms, from legal proceedings regarding what has been said by users on those platforms), but also (2) that where a provider does, in good faith, moderate what is published by American users,… [read post]