Search for: "Cox v. Cox"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,600
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
Benjamin EidelsonThis post offers preliminary analysis of DHS v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 12:06 pm
McCormick v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 8:08 pm
Cox and People v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 12:12 pm
The first of the two cases—40 Main Street Offices, LLC v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am
In Section 540F of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2020, Congress directed the Department of Defense to conduct a feasibility study, and to report the findings of that study, on a potential new “alternative military justice system. [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:00 am
” Never, but apparently, not for long.On June 20 of last year, in Gundy v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:16 am
Summit 6, LLC v. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 9:30 pm
" Jacobson v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:01 am
While Napster was eventually shut down (and later brought back), the issues of downloading music on P2P networks persist, and was the reason for a court case in the US where the jury gave an unprecedented damages reward.The case of Sony Music Entertainment v Cox Communications Inc is a class action lawsuit where Sony and other music companies alleged that Cox Communications did not stop ongoing copyright infringement after receiving notice of the alleged behavior. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:01 am
While Napster was eventually shut down (and later brought back), the issues of downloading music on P2P networks persist, and was the reason for a court case in the US where the jury gave an unprecedented damages reward.The case of Sony Music Entertainment v Cox Communications Inc is a class action lawsuit where Sony and other music companies alleged that Cox Communications did not stop ongoing copyright infringement after receiving notice of the alleged behavior. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 3:01 am
shown (apparently only in passing; I haven’t watched yet) in the background of a movie that not only flopped but did so 8 years ago” [Zahr Said on coverage by Kyle Jahner, Bloomberg Law] Jury awards $1 billion to music labels against cable and internet giant Cox, after claims it didn’t do enough to combat infringement by its users [Chris Eggertsen, Billboard] “Newspaper Can Talk About ‘Derby Pies’ Without Infringing Trademarks–Rupp v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:11 am
In Cox v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 3:34 am
In this case comment, Michael Cox of CMS comments on the judgment handed down in the matter of The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v Vauxhall Motors Ltd (Formerly General Motors UK Ltd) [2019] UKSC 46. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 9:52 am
Perfect 10 v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 9:00 am
Cox jury verdict. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 9:58 pm
Accordingly, Coix filed the Coix Health, LLC v. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 7:37 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 1:54 pm
Cox Castle was heavily involved in negotiations over the provisions of the State’s new program. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am
As Archibald Cox, the special prosecutor in the Watergate investigation who was fired during the Saturday Night Massacre, predicted, “[i]f the Executive Branch were left to itself, the practice [of executive privilege] would surely grow. [read post]
