Search for: "Cox v. Cox" Results 261 - 280 of 1,840
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2020, 3:34 am by CMS
In this case comment, Michael Cox of CMS comments on the judgment handed down in the matter of The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v Vauxhall Motors Ltd (Formerly General Motors UK Ltd) [2019] UKSC 46. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 7:34 am by Lawrence Cunningham
  Cox says the phone-hacking crimes the News Corporation papers committed in the U.K. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 5:05 am by Ray Mullman
The Missouri Supreme Court ruled recently in Watts v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
The tax collectors should too | Jonathan Freedland https://t.co/bqlOn020x5 -> FCA reverses decision on recovery of T24 royalties Rogers v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 1:53 pm
Weaver; Christine Grimaldi of Cox New Service reports here on the habeas corpus case in the Contra Costa Times; and Grant Slater has this article in the St. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 5:28 am
In lieu of flowers, donations may be sent to the First Presbyterian Church, 305 East Main Street, Durham, NC 27701, for the Robert Daye Habitat for Humanity House.This week at the CCAs: The Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals will hold oral argument on Wednesday in United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 8:47 am by Rebekah
Cox, 942 A.2d 296 (Conn. 2008). [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
By Gary Cox, Craig Humphris and Donna Meredith -- In the decision of Apotex Pty Ltd v Sanofi-Aventis Australia Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 50 (order), the High Court of Australia, Australia's supreme court, confirmed that methods of medical treatment are a "manner of manufacture" and therefore represent a patentable invention in Australia. [read post]