Search for: "Cox v. Cox"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,597
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2019, 4:25 pm
– Brian Cathcart Case Law, Strasbourg: ML and WW v Germany, Article 8 right to be forgotten and the media – Hugh Tomlinson QC and Aidan Wills Case Law: Venables v News Group Papers, Application to Vary Confidentiality Injunction Dismissed, PJS extended – Samuel Rowe Case Law: Lachaux v Independent Print, Supreme Court abolished common law presumption of damage in libel cases – Mathilde Groppo Supreme Court considers social media defamation: context… [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 10:28 am
Cox and Wyden included congressional findings and policy statements that explain their two primary goals. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 7:07 am
Armed with those legal victories, Goldman is now targeting new sites and companies, most notably Cox Media Group. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:16 am
Nixon therefore decided that Cox had to be removed from office.The “Massacre”RichardsonOn Saturday, October 20—the fateful day—Nixon directed Attorney General Richardson to remove Cox. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 8:09 am
” Because this involves an interlocutory appeal of the denial of a motion to dismiss, the cases raise the question whether this is one of the categories of interlocutory orders the Supreme Court has recognized to be “final decisions” subject to immediate review under Cox Broadcasting Corp v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 5:30 am
Chris Cox, Section 230’s co-sponsor, c [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins to Corey Robin in connection with Robin’s new book, “The Enigma of Clarence Thomas” (Metropolitan Books, 2019). [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 6:56 am
In the UMG v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am
In the context of congressional oversight, the executive branch has thus largely been, as Cox wrote, “left to itself. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 10:08 am
Cox and UMG v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 2:32 am
The 1709 Blog is happy to host the following contribution by Hugo Cox (Hamlins), concerning the recent joint authorship decision of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales in Kogan v Martin [see also IPKat here].Here's what Hugo writes:When creative collaboration goes wrongOne of the most distinctively European contributions of European law to UK copyright law has been its test for originality (being one of the requirements for copyright protection). [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 5:52 am
Nixon refused to turn over the tapes made in the Oval Office, lost in the US Supreme Court in US v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 7:18 am
Supreme Court had invalidated a similar provision about civilians wearing military uniforms in Schacht v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
The 2010 SpeechNow v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:54 pm
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:33 am
(Cox Communications and Aruba have made similar requests i [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 2:52 pm
See Lewis v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
” McFarlin v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 10:33 am
Malibu Media is alleging you (or […] The post Malibu Media LLC v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 10:13 am
Cox case, the court says that simply making works available does not constitute distribution. [read post]
