Search for: "Cox v. Cox" Results 281 - 300 of 1,599
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2019, 10:33 am by JAntonelli
Malibu Media is alleging you (or […] The post Malibu Media LLC v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 10:13 am by Eric Goldman
Cox case, the court says that simply making works available does not constitute distribution. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 12:31 pm by Eleonora Rosati
The 1709 Blog is happy to host this guest contribution by former 1709 Blog team member Hugo Cox (Hamlins LLP) on a recent decision of the High Court of England and Wales concerning copyright and make-up.Here's what Hugo writes:Copyright make-up tips - How to make a lasting impressionby Hugo CoxOne of the basic requirements for copyright protection in the UK is ‘fixation’ – the work has to have material form. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 9:20 am by Eric Goldman
Chris Cox and Ron Wyden drafted what would become Section 230 in 1995, after Cox read a newspaper article about a New York state trial court’s ruling in Stratton Oakmont v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 7:28 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 6:50 am by Eric Goldman
Twitter Twitter Defeats Yet Another Lawsuit from a Suspended User–Cox v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:00 am
A recent decision of the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court goes to the heart of all this, as Katfriend Hugo Cox (Hamlins LLP) explains.Here's what Hugo writes:Energy drink loses its fizz by Hugo CoxA recent judgment of the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, ATB Sales v Rich Energy, illustrates the potential significance of copyright law in the protection of brands.Whyte Bikes successfully sued Rich Energy drinks for infringing the copyright in their logo. [read post]