Search for: "Cox v. Cox"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,599
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
Vitulli’s alleged misconduct in advising the plaintiffs to sell the commercial property to Joseph Vitulli, Jr., since any injury from that misconduct is speculative (see Janker v Silver, Forrester & Lesser, P.C., 135 AD3d 908, 910; Sierra Holdings, LLC v Phillips, Weiner, Quinn, Artura & Cox, 112 AD3d 909, 910; Plymouth Org., Inc. v Silverman, Collura & Chernis, P.C., 21 AD3d 464, 465). [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:45 am
Father Brian Cox 24. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am
On 24 March 2023, there was a hearing in the case of Hayden v Family Education Trust. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 8:00 am
The bill currently awaits Governor Spencer Cox’s signature and would take effect sixty (60) days after its signing.[1] Originally enacted in 2010, the Online Prescribing Act has allowed health care providers to register with the State to prescribe and dispense certain FDA-approved drugs via online pharmacies and utilization of telehealth visits. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of Cox v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 11:36 am
Christopher Cox, co-authors of Section 230 Background on Gonzalez v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
Regulation S-K Item 402(v), the most recent disclosure requirement set forth in August 2022, requires the tabulation of more granular compensation details, stock returns, peer returns, and other performance measures. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:40 am
Victoria’s Secret v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 7:30 am
He’s best known for Brown v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:59 pm
” Slip op. at 62 (quoting from Gerber v. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 6:07 pm
We estimated adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to quantify associations between hair product use and uterine cancer using Cox proportional hazard models. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 2:00 pm
” Cox Commc’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 12:24 pm
Anchor Hanover Group v Cox (2023) UKUT 14 (LC) (Copy of judgment here. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 5:53 am
Although they have attracted less attention, the military justice provisions (found in division A, title V, subtitle E) are important, not only in their own right but also for what they may portend for the future and for what they unfortunately omit. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 5:00 am
In the case of Balderach v. [read post]
24 Nov 2022, 3:03 am
Cox Jr. ruled in favor of a filing by the Democratic Party and U.S. [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
” Fredrick v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
EPA and more in the concerns animating Justice Jackson’s concurrence in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 6:20 am
In Schultz v. [read post]
