Search for: "Cox v. Cox"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,805
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2020, 2:01 am
While Napster was eventually shut down (and later brought back), the issues of downloading music on P2P networks persist, and was the reason for a court case in the US where the jury gave an unprecedented damages reward.The case of Sony Music Entertainment v Cox Communications Inc is a class action lawsuit where Sony and other music companies alleged that Cox Communications did not stop ongoing copyright infringement after receiving notice of the alleged behavior. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:01 am
While Napster was eventually shut down (and later brought back), the issues of downloading music on P2P networks persist, and was the reason for a court case in the US where the jury gave an unprecedented damages reward.The case of Sony Music Entertainment v Cox Communications Inc is a class action lawsuit where Sony and other music companies alleged that Cox Communications did not stop ongoing copyright infringement after receiving notice of the alleged behavior. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:01 am
While Napster was eventually shut down (and later brought back), the issues of downloading music on P2P networks persist, and was the reason for a court case in the US where the jury gave an unprecedented damages reward.The case of Sony Music Entertainment v Cox Communications Inc is a class action lawsuit where Sony and other music companies alleged that Cox Communications did not stop ongoing copyright infringement after receiving notice of the alleged behavior. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 8:34 am
DeWolff, Boberg Associates , 06-856, it has denied review in the ERISA inalienability case of Cox v.... [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 3:40 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 3:32 am
” In Cox v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 1:11 pm
” Cox v. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 10:18 am
C&F reports that the Arkansas Supreme Court struck the following sentence from a brief in Cox v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 3:09 am
Se-Kure Controls, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 3:16 am
Se-Kure Controls, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 9:31 am
Henheffer, and Donald V. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 2:53 am
Our previous Trump v Twitter piece explained how s.230 gives both a shield and a sword to online providers like Twitter and Facebook, providing not only (1) that no provider shall be treated as the publisher of information provided by another (thereby protecting providers, as supposed mere platforms, from legal proceedings regarding what has been said by users on those platforms), but also (2) that where a provider does, in good faith, moderate what is published by American users,… [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 8:40 am
[Cox v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 12:24 pm
Anchor Hanover Group v Cox (2023) UKUT 14 (LC) (Copy of judgment here. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 10:43 am
Polk v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 6:00 am
In the notable Lawrence County Court of Common Pleas decision of Pavelko v. [read post]
13 Jan 2018, 7:25 pm
Issue summaries are from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers: Tuesday Cox v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:20 pm
Supreme Court coauthored by him, me, Jim Cox, and Lyman Johnson. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 7:44 pm
A three-judge panel of the Second Circuit ruled last week in Cox v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 5:56 pm
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In his opinion and order in EEOC v. [read post]
